Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 Available online 13 April 2024 0531-5565/© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Review article The effect of age and sex on peak oxygen uptake during upper and lower body exercise: A systematic review M.J. Price a,*, P.M. Smith b, L.M. Bottoms c, M.W. Hill a a Physical Activity, Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Centre, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK b Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cyncoed Campus, Cyncoed Road, Cardiff CF23 6XD, UK c Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK A R T I C L E I N F O Section Editor: Carel Meskers Keywords: Maximal oxygen uptake Arm crank ergometry Cycle ergometry Male Female Ageing A B S T R A C T Background: Large scale population norms for peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) during cycle ergometry (CE) have been published for men and women across a wide range of ages. Although upper body functional capacity has an important role in activities of daily living far less is known regarding the effect of age and sex on upper body functional capacity (i.e. arm crank ergometry; ACE). The aim of this review was to determine the effect of age and sex on VO2peak obtained during ACE and CE in the same participants. Method: The review was pre-registered with PROSEPERO (Ref: CRD42022349566). A database search using Academic Search Complete including CINAHL complete, CINHAL Ultimate, Medline, PubMed, SPORTDiscus was undertaken. Results: The initial search yielded 460 articles which was reduced to 243 articles following removal of duplicates. Twenty-five articles were subsequently excluded based on title resulting in 218 articles considered for retrieval. Following review of the abstracts, 78 further articles were excluded leaving 140 to be assessed for eligibility. Eighty-five articles were subsequently excluded, resulting in 55 articles being included. The decrease in VO2peak with age during CE was consistent with previous studies. Decreases in VO2peak during ACE with age, although paralleling those of CE, appeared to be of greater functional importance. When changes in VO2peak were considered below the age of 50 years little change was observed for absolute VO2peak during ACE and CE. In contrast, relative VO2peak demonstrated decreases in VO2peak for both ACE and CE likely reflecting increases in body mass and body fat percentage with age. After 50 years of age absolute and relative VO2peak demonstrated more similar and subtle responses. Heterogeneity across studies for both absolute and relative VO2peak between ACE and CE was large. Although strict inclusion criteria were applied, the inter-individual variation in sample populations was likely the main source of heterogeneity. There was a considerable lack data sets available for ages above 40 years of age. Conclusions: These responses suggest that upper body VO2peak decreases in line with that of the lower body but, due to the lower peak values achieved during ACE, decreases in VO2peak may have more profound functional impact compared to that for the lower body. Using absolute and relative measures of VO2peak results in different age-related profiles when considered below 50 years of age. To further our understanding of whole body ageing more data is required for participants in mid and later life. The association between VO2peak and underlying physiological factors with age needs to be studied further, particularly in conjunction with activities of daily living and independent living. 1. Introduction Arm crank ergometry (ACE) is a mode of exercise commonly used to assess the functional capacity of those individuals involved in upper body sports, such as paddlers (Tesch et al., 1982), wrestlers (Aschenbach et al., 2000) and wheelchair athletes (Nevin et al., 2018). Additionally, ACE is a relevant exercise mode for individuals who are either unable to use their legs due to spinal cord injury (Price and Campbell, 1997a) or for those with limited lower body exercise capacity, such as patients with intermittent claudication (Saxton et al., 2008) and chronic * Corresponding author. E-mail address: Aa5969@coventry.ac.uk (M.J. Price). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Experimental Gerontology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/expgero https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2024.112427 Received 20 June 2023; Received in revised form 4 April 2024; Accepted 8 April 2024 Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 2 obstructive pulmonary disease (Carter et al., 2003). Exercise protocols involving ACE have also been used to assess the effectiveness of health interventions for the purpose of prescribing training in otherwise healthy young (Bottoms and Price, 2014) and older adults (Hill et al., 2018a) and has shown clear predictive ability for clinical outcomes in people with lower-limb disability (Chan et al., 2011). ACE therefore demonstrates clear utility across the spectrum of healthy and clinical populations. Early studies of ACE in healthy individuals initially explored the influence of muscle mass on maximal aerobic power and lactate threshold across exercise modes (Davis et al., 1976). The resultant peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak; Magel et al., 1978) during ACE is generally reported to be approximately 70 % of that achieved during cycle ergo- metry (CE), the lower values resulting from the use of a smaller active muscle mass, notable peripheral muscular fatigue and lower central or cardiovascular strain (Davis et al., 1976). In a recent review Larsen et al. (Larsen et al., 2016) consolidated the literature evaluating the magni- tude of VO2peak during ACE when compared to CE in the same partici- pants. More specifically, the authors aimed to explore factors that may be predictive of the difference between exercise modes, potentially allowing for a direct comparison of data obtained during both tests. The pooled mean data demonstrated a difference of 12.5 ml.kg. 1 min 1 between ACE and CE, in favour of CE. Interestingly, younger partici- pants and those with greater aerobic capacity achieved a greater dif- ference between modes. However, substantial heterogeneity was evident across studies for the difference in VO2peak between exercise modes (I2 ˆ 59.9 %). Although Larsen and colleagues noted that the systematic difference in VO2peak between ACE and CE modes reduced with age, few studies had reported values for peak aerobic power for older age groups, with a similarly low number addressing values for women. Most of the studies included in the analysis reported VO2peak for participants in either their 20's or 30's, with only one, two and five studies reporting values for participants in their 40's, 50's and 60's, respectively. Conversely, large scale population norms for VO2peak during CE across a wide range of ages have been published for both sexes, with values peaking around 20–30 years of age and decreasing thereafter (Rapp et al., 2018). The decrease in VO2peak from 30 years of age is likely due to the subsequent age-related sarcopenia and a reduction in whole body oxidative capacity (Keller and Engelhardt, 2014). As fewer studies have reported VO2peak values for ACE in healthy older adults far less is known regarding the effect of age on upper body functional capacity. When considering that cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong and modifiable indicator of long- term mortality (Laukkanen et al., 2022) increasing our understanding of such age-related responses has clear importance. Furthermore, women are consistently reported to have lower all-cause mortality when compared to men (Harb et al., 2021), therefore, establishing any sex and age-related patterns in VO2peak is essential, particularly considering the clinical relevance of ACE testing and the lack of data for VO2peak during ACE in older women. Typical values reported for VO2peak during ACE and CE in healthy participants in their early 20's are ~24 and 39 ml.kg. 1min. 1, respec- tively (Price et al., 2014). In contrast, values of ~21 and 28 ml.kg. 1. min. 1 have been reported for healthy participants in their mid-60's (Hill et al., 2018a). Such results indicate that although VO2peak is lower during ACE in both age groups, the rate at which VO2peak decreases would appear slower for ACE, likely due to the initially lower aerobic training status of the upper body when compared to the lower body. To the authors knowledge, the effect of age on VO2peak in ACE and CE in the same participants has not been reported and could reveal unique in- sights in relation to how upper body functional capacity changes with age. Therefore, the aim of this review was to determine the effect of age on VO2peak obtained during upper and lower body ergometry. A sec- ondary aim was to determine how age-related changes in upper and lower body functional capacity may be affected by sex; an area currently very much under-reported in the literature. 2. Method Following institutional ethics approval (P120677) planning and conducting of the review was undertaken following the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021) and was pre-registered with PROSEPERO (Ref: CRD42022349566; August 2022). 2.1. Eligibility criteria Criteria for studies to be included within the review were; the comparison of VO2peak during incremental ACE and CE in the same participants, able-bodied or otherwise healthy participants and partici- pants above the age of 18 years. Exclusion criteria were; studies utilising independent group designs, studies comparing ACE to exercise modes other than CE, studies utilising non-standard ACE variants (i.e. standing ACE, braced ACE, handcycling, unilateral ACE, single or double polling) or semi-recumbent cycling and studies involving participants who were trained in either the upper or lower body. 2.2. Information sources A database search using Academic Search Complete including CINAHL complete, CINHAL Ultimate, Medline, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and both eBook collections and eBook open access Collection (EBCSO host) was undertaken between 20/06/22 and 27/06/22 for published studies up to and including July 2022. Reference lists of pertinent re- views (e.g. Larsen et al., 2016) and all articles obtained were scanned for further studies. 2.3. Search strategy Search terms included combinations of ‘peak oxygen uptake’ or ‘maximal oxygen uptake’ as the main outcome variable in combination with, and variants of, ‘upper body exercise’ and ‘arm crank ergometry’, and ‘lower body exercise’ and ‘cycle ergometry’ as well as ‘combined arm and leg exercise’ for exercise modes and, finally, terms relating to age and older populations. It should be noted that although the term ‘elderly’ was used within searches, it is acknowledged that the term ‘older adults’ is more appropriate (Avers et al., 2011), however, we did not want to potentially omit relevant studies due to changes in termi- nology. More specifically, searches included: 1) “Maximal oxygen uptake” or “Peak oxygen uptake” AND “upper body exercise” or “arm crank ergometry” or “arm cranking” AND “lower body exercise” or “cycle ergometry”, 2) “Maximal oxygen uptake” or “Peak oxygen uptake” AND “upper body exercise” or “arm crank ergometry” or “arm cranking” AND “Age” or “ageing” or “older” or “elderly”, 3) “Maximal oxygen uptake” or “Peak oxygen uptake” AND “lower body exercise” or “cycle ergometry” AND “Age” or “ageing” or “older” or “elderly” and, 4) “Maximal oxygen uptake” or “Peak oxygen uptake” AND “combined upper and lower body exercise” or “arm and leg exercise” or “arm and leg ergometry”. Only articles that were in English were selected whereas no limit was placed on publication date. Further independent searches for upper body exercise capacity (as per terms listed above) in clinical groups (e.g. hip replacement, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intermittent claudication, Parkinson's disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm) were also undertaken to obtain data from healthy age matched controls. 2.4. Selection process Two independent reviewers (MP, LB) performed the initial title screening from the resultant searches using an online systematic review M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 3 software package (Rayyan; https://www.rayyan.ai) to identify studies that potentially met inclusion criteria. Full text documents of selected studies were subsequently retrieved and assessed for eligibility by the primary reviewer (MP) and checked by a second reviewer (LB). Any disagreement between the independent reviewers was resolved through discussion, if agreement could not be reached a third reviewer was involved, although this was not required. 2.5. Data collection process Data from eligible studies was extracted and entered into an Excel spreadsheet populated with specific headings of; Study (authors and date), sample size, age, physical activity status, mass (kg), stature (m), body fat percentage or BMI (kg.m2) and absolute (l.min 1) and relative (ml.kg. 1min. 1) VO2peak (mean, standard deviation) for ACE and CE. Data was initially extracted by one reviewer (MP) and, in conjunction with methodological quality assessment ratings, was confirmed by all authors for their allocated studies. Each author worked independently. Where data was not available, a comment was provided on the spreadsheet for potential discussion of data completeness as appro- priate. No automation tools were used in the data collection process. 2.6. Data items The primary outcome measure of interest was VO2peak expressed as absolute values (l.min 1) and secondarily VO2peak expressed relative to body mass (ml.kg. 1min. 1). Where only absolute values were reported but body mass was also reported relative values were calculated from group mean values. The same principle applied when only relative values were reported. Where such data could not be determined the study was excluded. Based on these data further outcome variables were assessed, namely the difference in VO2peak between CE and ACE and the ratio between them (ACE:CE) following the approach utilised by Larsen et al. (Larsen et al., 2016). 2.7. Synthesis methods Extracted data for participant characteristics and VO2peak were tabulated according to studies reporting male or female participants. Scatterplots for age against VO2peak for ACE and CE for each group were initially plotted to determine the effect of age on VO2peak for both ex- ercise modes. Linear trendlines producing correlation coefficients (R) and coefficients of determination (R2) were subsequently generated using Microsoft Excel with the gradient of each linear trend line (rep- resenting the change in VO2peak per year) extrapolated to changes over a ten-year period. Where standard deviations for VO2peak were reported for included studies, the pooled standard deviation was calculated, and effect size established for the difference in VO2peak between ACE and CE. Data for VO2peak was also grouped according to decade of life, namely; 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79 years of age, as well as a smaller category of <20 yrs encompassing those studies with partici- pants under 20 years of age. To determine any meaningful differences in VO2peak across age group categories weighted means and pooled stan- dard deviations were calculated for each age category and compared using Hedges g. Following the recommendations of Deeks et al. (2022) values of g were interpreted as having small (<0.3), medium (~0.5) or large importance (>0.8). Heterogeneity (I2) between studies was also determined according to recommendations of Deeks et al., using freely available software (Suurmond et al., 2017). Values for I2 of between 0 and 40 %, 30–60 %, 50–90 % and 75–100 % were interpreted as likely unimportant, moderate, substantial and considerable hetereogeneity, respectively (Deeks et al., 2022). To further examine the relationship between body mass and both absolute and relative VO2peak correlations between these variables were performed using Pearson's correlation. 2.8. Study risk of bias assessment Eligible studies were assessed for methodological quality using the NIHR Quality Assessment Tool for observational cohort and cross- sectional studies (QAT) (NHLBI 2, n.d.) and the Downs and Black Quality Assessment Checklist (Downs and Black, 1998). Risk of bias per se was not assessed due to the observational and cross-sectional nature of the studies contained within the review not reflecting the design of randomised controlled trials considered by typical risk of bias tools. Equal numbers of studies were assessed for methodological quality by each author (n ˆ~15). The lead author confirmed ratings from a subset of assessment ratings from the three other authors, essentially moder- ating each author's assessment. Any disagreements between reviewers, or where a decision was difficult or could not be reached, were resolved by discussion between reviewers, with involvement of a third author where necessary. The outcomes of these assessments were subsequently integrated into the results and discussion sections of the review regarding the quality of evidence. Methodological assessment using the QAT was utilised as this was reported by Larsen et al. (Larsen et al., 2016) when reviewing the relationship between VO2peak during ACE and CE, whereas the Downs and Black checklist (Downs and Black, 1998) was utilised as this was reported by Baumgart et al. (Baumgart et al., 2018) when reviewing VO2peak in Paralympic sitting sports. Thus, both tools have been applied for the same outcome variable (VO2peak) and study designs as in the current review. In addition, both reviews used amended versions of the original tools as follows; Larsen et al. (Larsen et al., 2016) considered questions 1–5, 11, 12, 14 of the QAT whereas we additionally excluded question 3 (‘Was the participation rate of eligible persons at least 50%?’) and question 12 (‘Were the outcome assessors blinded to the exposure status of participants?’) as these were not appropriate for our inclusion criteria with respect to study design, resulting in a quality score out of six. Baumgart et al. considered questions 1–3, 5–7, 11, 12, 20–22, 25 of the Downs and Black checklist. In contrast to Baumgart et al. we included question 4 (‘Are the interventions of interest clearly described?’) rewording ‘interventions’ as ‘methods’ to cover the study as a whole, question 10 (‘Have actual probability values been reported (e. g.0.035 rather than <0.05) for the main outcomes except where the probability value is less than 0.001?’), question 18 (‘Were the statistical tests used to assess the main outcomes appropriate?’), question 23 (‘Were study subjects randomised to intervention groups?’) rewording ‘intervention groups’ to ‘trials’, and question 27 (‘Did the study have sufficient power to detect a clinically important effect where the prob- ability value for a difference being due to chance is less than 5%?’). We excluded questions 6 and 7 relating to intervention groups. Question 5 referring to confounders related to reporting and discussing of sex, age, mass, training status, differences between upper and lower body phys- iology. All questions scored 1 (Yes) or zero (No/unable to determine). Results from the Downs and Black checklist were reported out of a total of 15. Both scales were converted to a percentage score and considered as being of poor (<46 %), fair (54–62 %), good (65–80 %) or excellent (85–100 %) methodological quality. 3. Results 3.1. Study selection The initial search yielded 460 articles which was reduced to 243 articles following removal of duplicates. Twenty-five articles were subsequently excluded based on title resulting in 218 articles considered for retrieval. Following review of the abstracts, 78 further articles were excluded leaving 140 to be assessed for eligibility. Of these articles, 85 were excluded, resulting in 55 articles being included (Fig. 1). Of the 55 studies (n ˆ 739) fitting the inclusion criteria, 41 provided one data set, 13 provided two data sets and one provided three data sets, resulting in a total of 70 useable data sets. Of these data sets, 56 provided M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 4 peak physiological responses for ACE and CE in men and 14 in women. Specific values for the frequency of studies in each age group are shown in Table 1. The overwhelming majority of studies recruited participants be- tween the ages of 18–39 years. Similar percentages of studies had been undertaken for men and women between the ages of 20–29 (~68 and 71 %, respectively) and 30–39 years (~16 and 14 %, respectively). Few studies (n ˆ 8) had been undertaken in older age groups (i.e. 50–79 years). Study population characteristics are shown in Table 2. Studies reporting data for men and women generated similar overall ages and mean sample size across studies. Males were generally heavier than fe- males (Table 2), a fact that was echoed for <20, 20–29 and 30–39 yrs age categories (76.3  11.4, 73.8  19.1 and 78.8  9.6 kg for males and 55.4  7.0, 60.8  8.1 and 60.2  5.1 kg for females, respectively). 3.2. Study characteristics The characteristics of each study for men and women are shown in Tables 3a, 3b and 4. 3.3. Absolute peak oxygen uptake The relationship between absolute VO2peak (l.min 1) and age for men and women is shown in Fig. 2a and b. The accompanying summary statistics from linear fits of VO2peak against age are shown in Table 5. The decrease in absolute VO2peak over a ten-year period was approximately 0.2 and 0.3 l.min 1 for ACE and CE, respectively. These values repre- sented 7.2 and 8.3 % for men and 9.2 and 7.6 % for women when related to the 20–29 group, respectively. Fitting nonlinear curves such as polynomials did not improve the R2 values for either data set. Fig. 1. PRISMA flow chart, adapted from Page et al. (2021). Table 1 Frequency and percentage of included data sets providing peak physiological responses for arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry in men and women. N Age group (years) <20 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 70–79 Male 56 2 37 9 1 2 4 1 Male (%) – 3.6 66.1 16.1 1.7 3.6 7.1 1.8 Female 14 1 10 2 0 1 0 0 Female (%) – 7.1 71.4 14.3 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 5 The weighted means and pooled standard deviations for absolute VO2peak during ACE and CE in relation to each age category for those studies reporting data for men are shown in Fig. 3a. Absolute VO2peak for ACE was moderately greater in the <20 yrs age group than for the 20–29 yrs category (g ˆ 0.564; 9.7 %) but considerably greater than all other age categories (g ˆ 0.786 to 2.566, 17.8 to 48.7 %). Although absolute VO2peak was lower for 40–49 yrs compared to <20 yrs, differ- ences between 40 and 49 and both 20–29 and 30–39 categories were of small importance (g ˆ 0.448, 5.0 % and g ˆ 0.259, 2.6 %, respectively). There was a large decrease in absolute VO2peak from 40 to 49 yrs to 50–59 yrs (12.2 %) onwards (g ˆ 1.117 to 2.525). Values at 50–59 yrs were of moderate difference to 70–79 yrs (16.9 %) whereas values at 60–69 yrs were of large importance when compared to 50–59 yrs (4.9 %), demonstrating the fluctuation in absolute VO2peak values. For CE, absolute values of VO2peak at <20 yrs were considered similar to 20–29 yrs (g ˆ 0.185, 2.2 %) and 40–49 yrs (g ˆ 0.234, 3.0 %) but considered of large importance between all other age groups (g ˆ 1.063 to 4.144, 10.0 to 47.6 %). With the exception of potentially moderate to large decreases in absolute VO2peak at 30–39 yrs (3.20 l.min 1, 11.4 %), peak values up to 40–49 yrs were generally similar (3.50 to 3.61 l.min 1, 3.1 %). Similarly to ACE, a large decrease in absolute VO2peak occurred at 50–59 yrs, with potentially larger decreases observed between both 50–59 yrs and 60–69 yrs (both 2.25 l.min 1) compared to 70–79 yrs (1.89 l.min 1, 10 %). For women, no included studies reported absolute VO2peak for the 40–49, 60–69 or 70–79 yrs groups. The <20 yrs group absolute VO2peak values during ACE were greater than all other age groups and of a moderate to large importance (13.9 to 29.8 %). Both the 20–29 and 30–39 yrs categories demonstrated greater VO2peak than those of the 50–59 yrs category being of moderate (g ˆ 0.552, 15.9 %) to large importance (g ˆ 0.804, 29.8 %). The VO2peak during CE demonstrated the same trends. 3.4. Relative peak oxygen uptake The relationship between relative VO2peak (ml.kg 1.min 1) and age for men and women is shown in Fig. 4a and b. The accompanying summary statistics from linear fits are shown in Table 5. With the exception of the female data during CE, the potential decrease in VO2peak over a ten-year period was similar across data sets for both ACE (~3.1 to 4.1 ml.kg. 1 min 1 for men and women, respectively) and CE (~4.8 to 6.5 ml.kg. 1 min 1, respectively). Decreases in VO2peak for ACE and CE for men represented 8.9 and 10.0 % when compared to the 20–29 group, respectively. Decreases were lower for women during ACE. Fig. 3b shows weighted means and pooled standard deviations for relative VO2peak in relation to each age category for those studies reporting data for male participants. Results for both ACE and CE demonstrated similar responses in VO2peak up until 40–49 years of age. For example, Hedges g values indicated that VO2peak at <20 yrs and 20–29 yrs were similar for both ACE (g ˆ 0.387, 5.0 %) and CE (g ˆ 0.000, 0 %) as were values between 30 and 39 yrs and 40–49 yrs for ACE (g ˆ 0.148, 0 %) and CE (g ˆ 0.000, 0 %). However, the decrease in VO2peak from 20 to 29 yrs to 30–39 yrs was large for ACE (g ˆ 0.775, 12.1 %) but only medium for CE (g ˆ 0.583, 8.3 %). After this point there was a large decrease in VO2peak from 40 to 49 years to 50–59 yrs for both ACE (g ˆ 2.169, 34.4 %) and CE (g ˆ 2.274, 38.6 %). Subse- quent decreases in VO2peak from 50 to 59 yrs to 70–79 yrs groups were again considered medium for ACE (g ˆ 0.632, 10.5 %, respectively) but low for CE (g ˆ 0.283, 11.1 %, respectively). For females ACE and CE values were also similar between 20 and 29 and 30–39 age categories (g ˆ 0.146, 7.4 % to 0.343, 5.0 %) with large decreases occurring up to the 50–59 yrs category (40.7 and 48.1 %, respectively). However, values for the <20 yrs age group were consid- ered greater and large when compared to all other age groups (g ˆ 1.236 to 5.394). Although the above figures (Figs. 2, 4) have shown general decreases in absolute and relative VO2peak for ACE and CE from 19 to 75 years of age, more subtle differences between measures were observed when decreases in VO2peak were considered above and below the age of 50 yrs (Fig. 5). For absolute VO2peak there was little change from <20 to 40–49 years for CE (0.04 l.min 1 per decade, 0.10 %) or ACE (0.12 l.min 1 per decade, 4.5 %). Similarly, there was little change from 50-59 to 70–79 years for CE (0.11 l.min 1 per decade, 3.0 % compared to <20 yrs, 4.9 % compared to 50–59 yrs) or ACE (0.04 l.min 1 per decade, 1.5 % compared to <20, 2.5 % compared to 50–59 yrs). In contrast, relative VO2peak values from <20 to 40–49 years for both CE and ACE decreased by 3.4 (7.1 % relative to <20 yrs) and 3.8 ml.kg. 1min. 1 per decade (10.9 % relative to <20 yrs), respectively. However, there was little change in values for CE (0.2 ml.kg. 1min. 1 per decade, 0.4 % relative to <20 yrs, 0.7 % relative to 50–59 yrs) or ACE from 50 to 59 to 70–79 yrs (0.8 ml.kg. 1min. 1 per decade, 2.3 % relative to <20 yrs, 4.2 % relative to 50–59 yrs). There was no relationship between body mass and age (R ˆ 0.175, R2 ˆ 0.030, P ˆ 0.228) or body mass and absolute VO2peak for ACE (R ˆ 0.052, R2 ˆ 0.003, P ˆ 0.716) or CE (R ˆ 0.022, R2 ˆ 0.001, P ˆ 0.875). Significant relationships were observed between body mass and relative VO2peak during ACE (R ˆ 0.333, R 2 ˆ 0.111, P ˆ 0.019) and CE (R ˆ 0.328, R2 ˆ 0.107, P ˆ 0.021). 3.5. Effect sizes and heterogeneity Mean ES for absolute VO2peak for men and women were large (2.4  1.5 and 1.8  1.3, respectively) as were values for relative VO2peak (2.3  1.0 and 2.7  2.0, respectively). Heterogeneity (I2) values for absolute VO2peak for men and women were both 87 %. Values for relative VO2peak were 84 and 85 %, respectively. 3.6. Ratio between VO2peak during ACE and CE and age The ratio of VO2peak between ACE and CE (i.e. ACE: CE) is shown in Fig. 6. Responses were similar for ACE:CE whether VO2peak had been expressed as absolute or relative values. The ACE:CE was greatest for the youngest age category (<20 yrs) and gradually decreased to 30–39 yrs, remaining similar at 40–49 yrs. Ratios then increased from this point until 60–69 yrs. 3.7. Methodological quality The results of the methodological quality assessments indicated mean scores of 69 % (29 to 100 %) and 73 % (44 to 100 %) for the QAT and Downs and Black tools, respectively. The QAT resulted in a lower number of studies in the good (34 %) and excellent (26 %) categories when compared to Downs and Black (52 and 35 %, respectively). For most questions posed, over 87 % of studies fulfilled the specific criteria Table 2 Overall sample characteristics for studies providing peak physiological responses for arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry in men and women. Group characteristics Age (years) Mass (kg) Stature (cm) Group n Mode n Range Min Max Total n Male 32 (13) 79 (12) 181 (5) 9 (1) 10 29 1 30 584 Female 28 (9) 61 (5) 165 (6) 10 (6) 10 26 1 27 155 M.J. Price et al. ExperimentalGerontology190(2024)112427 6 Table 3a Characteristics of included studies for men of mean age between 20 and 29 years undertaking both arm crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CE) graded exercise protocols to exhaustion (n ˆ 37). NST ˆ non- specifically trained; PA ˆ physically active; Untr ˆ untrained; Uni Std ˆ university standard; PE ˆ physical education; Rec ˆ recreational; NS ˆ not stated; MA ˆmoderately active; NCS ˆ no competitive Sport; min⋅d 1 ˆ minutes per day; Sed ˆ sedentary; ES ˆ effect size; D&B ˆ Downs and Black quality rating; QAT ˆ NIHR quality rating. Authors N Training status Age (yrs) Mass (kg) Stature (cm) Relative VO2peak (ml⋅kg 1⋅min 1) Absolute VO2peak (l⋅min 1) Quality rating Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD ACE CE ES ACE CE ES QAT (%) D&B (%) Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD 20–29 yrs Lewis et al. (1980) 5 Healthy 20.0 3.0 73.0 12.0 175 2 22 37 – – 1.64 0.22 2.69 0.40 3.3 43 56 Koppo et al. (2002) 10 PA 21.3 0.8 73.9 5.3 180 6 37 5 58 6 3.9 2.74 4.31 – – 43 69 Schneider et al. (2002) 10 Untr 21.6 1.3 80.7 3.1 180 1 26 2 39 2 6.8 2.08 0.11 3.10 0.14 8.1 71 69 Hill et al. (2018b) 10 PA, MST 21.7 3.4 73.6 8.7 181 5 37 5 43 4 1.6 2.68 0.34 3.17 0.46 1.2 100 100 Dekerle et al. (2002) 20 PE students 22.0 2.2 73.5 5.3 180 6 27 4 38 6 2.3 2.74 0.35 3.81 0.57 2.3 86 81 Lewis et al. (1980) 5 Healthy 22.0 2.0 79.0 13.0 186 10 25 – 39 – – 1.97 0.32 3.09 0.41 3.0 43 56 Pimental et al. (1984) 9 Healthy 22.0 3.0 71.4 6.9 172 8 35 6 49 7 2.2 2.49 3.48 – – 33 53 Sawka et al. (1984) 9 Healthy 22.0 3.0 71.4 7.0 – – 34 6 48 7 2.1 2.46 0.42 3.44 0.52 2.1 83 76 Toner et al. (1984) 8 Healthy 22.4 3.6 70.9 6.2 171 5 36 5 47 7 2.0 2.54 0.40 3.34 0.53 1.7 50 59 Davis et al. (1976) 30 No end tr for 4 mo 22.5 2.5 75.5 9.0 180 7 31 4 49 5 3.7 2.34 0.39 3.68 0.41 3.3 67 59 Warren et al. (1990) 10 Untr 22.6 5.1 74.4 9.5 175 6 30 5 47 5 3.8 2.17 0.27 3.43 0.26 4.8 71 81 Nag (1984) 5 Motivated 22.7 3.4 48.9 0.9 160 2 37 – 45 – – 1.81 0.36 2.20 0.38 1.1 43 56 Swensen et al. (1993) 5 Untr 22.8 73.0 – – 28 – 40 – – 2.02 0.20 2.94 0.20 4.6 57 75 Turner et al. (1997) 6 Rec, NST 23.0 1.0 75.0 2.0 179 1 34 1 49 2 9.5 2.55 – 3.68 – – 29 44 Ogata and Yano (2005) 8 Healthy 23.4 2.7 67.7 4.4 173 5 29 – 37 1.98 0.23 2.53 0.31 2.0 57 69 Bohnert et al. (1998) 6 Healthy 23.8 0.7 71.0 5.6 178 8 33 7 50 10 2.0 2.23 0.51 3.51 0.71 2.1 57 69 Sharp et al. (1988) 18 NS 23.9 3.7 75.9 8.8 177 9 34 – 48 – – 2.57 0.46 3.63 0.56 2.1 43 44 Helge et al. (2011) 10 Healthy 24.0 1.0 77.6 2.1 179 3 31 5 50 6 3.5 2.36 0.42 3.80 0.38 3.6 43 44 Tiller et al. (2019) 8 Rec 24.0 5.0 74.0 11.0 179 7 31 6 41 10 1.2 2.36 0.54 3.12 0.72 1.2 71 88 Hill et al. (2014) 9 Healthy, Untr 24.1 4.8 75.6 13.9 177 5 35 7 45 8 1.3 2.62 0.34 3.23 0.52 1.4 100 100 Hill et al. (2020) 12 MA, 2–3 wk 24.6 5.3 83.1 8.4 181 7 31 4 40 6 2.0 2.52 0.27 3.27 0.33 2.5 86 94 Hill et al. (2019) 13 PA, 2–3 wk 24.7 5.0 74.1 9.4 177 8 34 6 44 7 1.5 2.62 0.62 3.27 0.61 1.1 86 94 Yasuda et al. (2006) 12 Rec, mild intensity 24.7 6.0 73.0 12.0 178 8 33 5 59 7 4.0 2.41 0.39 4.25 0.68 3.3 57 69 Kang et al. (1998) 10 Healthy, NCS 25.0 4.0 84.0 16.0 176 4 32 – 41 – – 2.66 0.45 3.45 0.58 1.5 86 88 Reybrouck et al. (1975) 1 Not regularly active 25.0 – 68.0 – – – 32 – 39 – – 2.19 – 2.67 – – 67 73 Yasuda et al. (2008) 9 Rec, mild intensity 25.0 6.9 74.2 12.8 178 7 34 5 60 6 4.9 2.39 0.43 4.21 0.64 3.3 71 81 Bhambhani et al. (1998) 15 University students, Rec 25.2 5.3 72.8 8.5 176 8 38 7 55 13 1.6 2.77 0.69 4.04 1.16 1.3 86 81 Lyons et al. (2007) 10 PA, MA 30 min.d-1 25.7 5.8 104.9 18.7 184 7 21 – 30 – – 2.20 0.25 3.10 0.38 2.8 73 67 Sporer et al. (2007) 8 Non cyclist, NST 26.0 5.0 82.8 8.1 185 7 30 5 44 4 3.2 2.52 – 3.56 – – 71 81 Maresh et al. (2006) 8 Healthy, Untr, Rec 26.4 3.5 76.6 10.2 179 6 32 3 47 5 3.4 2.48 – 3.59 – – 57 69 Marterer et al. (2020) 9 up to 3/wk, NST 27.5 5.0 – – 185 7 40 6 52 6 2.1 3.12 0.66 4.18 0.90 1.3 71 81 Franklin et al. (1983) 10 Healthy 28.0 2.4 69.3 7.1 171 8 37 – 46 – – 2.54 0.45 3.17 0.53 1.3 86 81 Miles et al. (1983) 9 NS 28.0 6.0 78.0 12.0 – – 29 – 42 – – 2.30 – 3.30 – – 67 71 Sawka et al. (1983) 9 Healthy 28.0 6.0 78.0 12.0 – – 29 – 42 – – 2.27 0.30 3.31 0.53 2.4 57 69 Jensen-Urstad et al. (1993) 7 PA, NCS 28.3 1.4 75.3 1.3 183 3 35 2 56 4 7.1 2.65 0.14 4.22 0.11 12.5 86 88 Pivarnik et al. (1988) 8 Healthy 28.4 3.6 72.3 5.5 182 3 36 – 56 – – 2.60 0.44 4.07 0.52 3.1 83 71 Aminoff et al. (1999) 3 Kitchen workers 28.8 – 75.2 – 179 26 3 52 2 9.9 1.98 0.39 3.87 0.43 4.6 83 71 M .J. Price et al. ExperimentalGerontology190(2024)112427 7 Table 3b Characteristics of included studies for men of mean age between <20 years and between 30 and 79 years undertaking both arm crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CE) graded exercise protocols to exhaustion (n ˆ 19). NST ˆ non-specifically trained; PA ˆ physically active; Untr ˆ untrained; Uni Std ˆ university standard; PE ˆ physical education; Rec ˆ recreational; ns ˆ not stated; MA ˆmoderately active; NCS ˆ no competitive Sport; min⋅d 1 ˆ minutes per day; Sed ˆ sedentary; ES ˆ effect size; D&B ˆ Downs and Black quality rating; QAT ˆ NIHR quality rating. Authors N Training status Age (yrs) Mass (kg) Stature (cm) Relative VO2peak (ml⋅kg 1⋅min 1) Absolute VO2peak (l⋅min 1) Quality rating Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD ACE CE ES ACE CE ES D&B (%) QAT (%) Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD <20 yrs Price et al. (2022) 13 Healthy, NST 19.3 0.5 78.1 9.1 – – 36 7 48 5 2.0 2.73 0.64 3.62 0.46 1.6 86 88 Price et al. (2014) 8 PA, Uni Std, team sports 19.8 0.7 79.1 14.6 181 5 34 6 48 11 1.6 2.61 0.29 3.60 0.29 3.4 83 82 30-39 yrs Davies et al. (1974) 12 Healthy 30.5 6.0 75.1 10.1 178 5 21 – 47 – – 1.60 0.28 3.50 0.37 5.8 57 50 Rosler et al. (1985) 10 Healthy, Rec 30.5 – 70.8 – 178 38 – 52 – – 2.72 0.13 3.66 0.12 7.5 86 81 Sargeant and Davies (1973) 6 Healthy 30.7 5.5 79.1 11.7 180 6 22 2 44 6 5.4 1.71 0.30 3.49 0.33 5.6 57 69 Ara et al. (2011) 10 Control group 31.2 1.5 91.0 4.2 184 3 28 40 – – 2.50 1.20 3.60 0.10 1.3 57 69 Barstow et al. (1993) 3 Untr 31.3 7.6 78.3 11.6 – – 26 8 35 11 1 1.96 0.47 2.65 0.44 1.5 57 63 Shiomi et al. (2000) 7 No regular exercise 32.1 – 64.1 – 170 – 29 2 46 5 4.1 1.87 – 2.92 – – 57 69 Louhevaara et al. (1990) 21 Healthy, Untr 33.3 5.9 78.3 12.7 178 7 32 41 2.52 0.32 3.24 0.44 1.9 57 63 Bhambhani (1995) 25 Rec 35.0 7.3 82.9 9.1 178 7 30 7 44 6 2.1 2.49 0.51 3.61 0.51 2.2 57 69 Bhambhani et al. (1991) 8 NST 35.2 6.6 85.0 – 176 7 32 6 45 6 2.1 2.72 0.20 3.77 0.46 3.0 86 75 40–49 yrs Bhambhani et al. (1991) 8 NST 41.0 4.7 80.4 11 178 5 29 5 44 6 2.7 2.29 – 3.47 – – 86 75 50–59 yrs Keteyian et al. (1994) 10 Healthy, Rec 51.0 5.0 80.4 15.6 – – 19 – 28 – – 1.50 0.12 2.28 0.16 5.5 43 69 Mitropoulos et al. (2017) 6 Sed, no training history 51.7 4.7 85.0 12.4 176 8 19 4 26 10 0.9 1.80 0.50 2.20 0.70 0.7 100 82 60–69 yrs McKeough et al. (2003) 7 Healthy, no regular training 62.0 2.0 – – – – 16 4 23 8 1.1 – – – – – 93 83 Protas et al. (1996) 7 Majority sedentary, 2 ˆ MA 65.0 – – – – – 16 – 25 – – – – – – – 71 86 Pogliaghi et al. (2006) 6 Sed, <20 min 3/wk 66.0 5.0 76.0 11.0 169 6 24 4 29 5 1.0 1.62 0.24 2.31 0.37 2.2 86 81 Pogliaghi et al. (2006) 6 Sed, <20 min 3/wk 68.0 4.0 74.0 6.0 172 4 22 3 31 5 2.5 1.84 0.30 2.18 0.28 1.2 86 81 70–79 yrs Pogliaghi et al. (2006) 6 Sed, <20 min 3/wk 73.0 4.0 80.0 8.0 173 8 17 2 24 3 2.7 1.37 0.25 1.89 0.42 1.5 86 81 M .J. Price et al. ExperimentalGerontology190(2024)112427 8 Table 4 Characteristics of included studies for women undertaking both arm crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CE) graded exercise protocols to exhaustion (nˆ16). NST ˆ non-specifically trained; PA ˆ physically active; Untr ˆ untrained; Uni Std ˆ university standard; PE ˆ physical education; Rec ˆ recreational; ns ˆ not stated; MA ˆmoderately active; NCS ˆ no competitive sport; min⋅d 1 ˆminutes per day; Sed ˆ sedentary; ES ˆ effect size; D&B ˆ Downs and Black quality rating; QAT ˆ NIHR quality rating. Authors N Training status Age (yrs) Mass (kg) Stature (cm) Relative VO2peak (ml⋅kg 1⋅min 1) Absolute VO2peak (l⋅min 1) Quality rating Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD ACE CE ES ACE CE ES D&B (%) QAT (%) Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD <20 yrs Muraki et al. (2004) 27 Healthy, some were PA 19.9 0.56 55.4 7.0 162 6 30.9 6.5 44.4 5.9 2.2 1.74 0.52 2.47 0.52 1.4 57 56 20–29 yrs Bhambhani et al. (1998) 10 Uni students, Rec 21.3 4.9 64.5 5.4 166 4 27.3 5.4 38.9 10.4 1.4 1.77 0.41 2.53 0.82 1.2 86 81 Orr et al. (2013) 15 Not MA or trained cyclists 23.4 3.7 60.6 7.8 167 5 24.9 4.0 39.8 7.2 2.6 1.51 – 2.41 – – 71 81 Yasuda et al. (2008) 9 Rec, mild intensity 23.4 3.6 63.6 5.5 167 8 25.9 7.8 50.9 5.7 3.7 1.62 0.37 3.13 0.3 4.2 71 81 Barstow et al. (1993) 1 Untr 24.0 – 59.0 – – 17.8 – 31.0 – 1.05 – 1.85 – – 57 63 Helge et al. (2011) 6 Healthy 24.0 1.0 64.2 5.6 169 2 27.5 1.5 45.4 6.2 4.0 1.62 0.14 2.85 0.27 5.7 43 44 Marterer et al. (2020) 11 PA up to 3/wk, NST 24.3 3.0 – – 167 9 26.4 3.3 39.5 4.8 3.2 1.55 0.31 2.33 0.53 1.8 71 81 Yasuda et al. (2006) 10 Rec, mild intensity 25.0 3.4 62.5 6.2 166 7 25.7 7.3 49.1 6.1 3.5 1.59 0.36 3.06 0.40 3.9 57 69 Warren et al. (1990) 10 Untrained 25.1 7.8 54.3 7.1 161 4 25.4 7.4 36.6 8.6 1.4 1.34 0.29 1.95 0.27 2.2 71 81 Kang et al. (1998) 7 Healthy, NCS 27.0 8.0 65.0 20.0 166 4 21.2 – 34.0 – 1.38 0.70 2.21 0.82 1.1 86 88 30–39 yrs Bhambhani (1995) 12 Rec 32.1 7.7 – – – – 25.1 4.9 36.6 7.1 1.9 1.48 0.25 2.16 0.37 2.2 71 75 Aminoff et al. (1999) 6 Kitchen workers 32.4 – 63.0 – 172 – 22.0 5.0 36.0 7.0 2.3 1.39 0.27 2.15 0.36 2.4 83 71 Javierre et al. (2007) 15 Healthy, Sed 35.6 – 57.5 5.1 159 5 17.9 4.8 23.4 6.1 1.0 1.04 0.25 1.36 0.38 1.0 43 69 50–59 yrs Mitropoulos et al. (2017) 6 Sed, no training history 58.5 2.4 73.6 13.4 160 7 13.8 2.5 20.4 4.0 2.0 1.06 0.24 1.48 0.24 1.8 100 92 M .J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 9 asked. This return was lower for questions regarding discussion of confounders (50 %), including specific inclusion and exclusion criteria (56 %) and randomisation of trials (66 %). The aspects least well re- ported were the justification of sample size (13 %) and the reporting of actual P values (32 %). 4. Discussion This is the first systematic review to consider VO2peak during ACE and CE in the same participants specifically in relation to age and sex. The key findings were that; (1) when considered across the whole age range, absolute and relative VO2peak decreased at similar rates for both exercise modes for men and women, (2) however, when considered above and below 50 years of age VO2peak demonstrated different age related re- sponses for absolute and relative values, (3) where meaningful decreases in VO2peak were observed between age categories these tended to be greater for ACE than for CE, (4) Variability in VO2peak across studies was greater for the younger age groups (20–29 and 30–39 yrs) likely due to Fig. 2. The relationship between absolute VO2peak (l⋅min 1) and age in men (a) and women (b). M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 10 the existence of more studies in this population and (5) there was a lack of studies providing data for participants from 40 years of age, partic- ularly between 40 and 59 years of age. 4.1. Peak oxygen uptake in relation to age 4.1.1. Cycle ergometry in males The current review indicated decreases in VO2peak for men during CE of 9–10 % per decade for absolute (0.3 l.min 1) and relative VO2peak (4.5 ml.kg. 1min. 1). Previous studies of cross-sectional data have indicated decreases in VO2peak during CE of ~4.2 ml.kg. 1min. 1 per decade (Herdy and Uhlendorf, 2011) with longitudinal data for absolute VO2peak during CE over 20 years indicating decreases equivalent to ~20 % (Astrand et al., 1973). Although the latter is greater than the ~16 % in the current review for a similar age range, this is potentially due to use of longitudinal rather the cross-sectional data (Fleg et al., 1995). Conversely, Rapp et al. (Rapp et al., 2018), produced norms from a large population study (n ˆ 10,090; men n ˆ 6462) suggesting a decrease of 3.3 ml.kg 1.min 1 per decade between 25 and 69 yrs. Although, norms for VO2peak produced by Rapp et al. from 50 years onwards were consistently ~3 ml.kg 1.min 1 per decade greater than in the present study, the rate of decrease was similar between 50 and 69 years of age. Therefore, the decrease in VO2peak for men over similar age ranges is consistent with previous research. 4.1.2. Arm crank ergometry in males The overall decrease in VO2peak during ACE per decade for men was lower than that for CE, amounting to a reduction of 0.2 compared to 0.3 l.min 1 (3.1 and 4.5 ml.kg. 1min. 1) respectively. However, the overall decreases in VO2peak for both exercise modes between 20–29 yrs were similar (9.4 and 9.8 % for ACE and CE, respectively) which closely ap- proximates previous projections of a 10 % decrease in VO2peak per decade (Shephard, 2009). Furthermore, decreases in VO2peak during ACE occurred within the same age categories as for CE but to a greater extent. Large changes were observed from 20–29 to 30–39 yrs for ACE compared to moderate changes for CE, and medium changes between 50–59 and both 60–69 and 70–79 for ACE compared to small changes for CE. These responses suggest that upper body VO2peak decreases in line with that of the lower body, but, due to the lower peak values achieved during ACE, decreases in VO2peak may have more profound functional impact compared to that for the lower body. 4.1.3. Decreases in peak oxygen uptake before and after 50 years of age Scatter plots of absolute and relative VO2peak for ACE and CE against age across all studies suggested good linear fits. However, the figures presenting weighted means for VO2peak during ACE and CE for each decade indicate different phases and rates of decrease with age for both exercise modes. Specifically, moderate to large changes were evident from 20–29 to 30–39 yrs and small to moderate changes were evident between 50–59 and both 60–69 and 70–79 yrs for ACE and CE, respectively. This trend was observed for men and women and for both relative and absolute values of VO2peak. Indeed, Fleg et al. (Fleg et al., 1995) observed that the decrease in VO2peak during treadmill exercise was non-linear over the lifespan. Although the non-linear decrease in VO2peak with age appears consistent with previous studies (Hansen et al., 2019), the regression equations generated for VO2peak and age above and below 50 years of age indicated different responses, particularly for VO2peak expressed as absolute and relative values. For example, below the age of 50 yrs, there was a clear decrease in relative VO2peak with age for ACE and CE (7.8, 11.1 %, respectively), but little or no change in absolute VO2peak (4.5, 0.1 %, respectively). Similar values for absolute VO2peak across ages but decreasing values for relative VO2peak most likely represents an increase in body mass with age, with such changes likely resulting in a concomitant increase in proportions of fat mass. Although there was no significant correlation between age and body mass per se across the included studies, those reporting body fat percentage did indicate a rise from ~16 to ~25 % body fat from the 20–29 and 30–39 yrs age cate- gories. Furthermore, relative VO2peak was correlated with body mass, likely due to inclusion of body mass in its calculation, whereas absolute VO2peak was not correlated. However, without specific body composi- tion data for each study no further insight can be readily gained. It should be noted though, that using absolute and relative measures of VO2peak results in different age-related profiles when considered below 50 years of age. Changes in VO2peak after 50 years of age were similar between ACE and CE no matter whether expressed as absolute or relative VO2peak. Furthermore, there were no differences when potential changes in VO2peak at 70–79 yrs were expressed relative to the youngest age group considered in the analysis (i.e. <20 yrs; 1.5 to 3.0 %) or the youngest group from 50 yrs onwards (i.e. 50–59 yrs; 2.5 to 5.0 %). More impor- tantly, both the absolute and relative VO2peak relationships with age above 50 years were relatively flat. Fleg et al. (Fleg et al., 1995) noted how healthy active volunteers may have genetic and lifestyle differences to participants recruited in younger age groups, who may not survive to old age. As a result, each consecutive decade presents a more highly selected group than its predecessor (Fleg et al., 1995). Such a factor may explain the similarity of values across the later decades of life observed in the current analysis. This information holds the potential to identify threshold values associated with preserved aerobic function and an acceptable quality of life, as previously reported for treadmill exercise (~18 and 15 ml.kg. 1min. 1 for men and women, respectively; Paterson et al., 1999). Data for older age groups in the current analysis were often derived from control groups of studies examining clinical groups, few studies purposively recruited and reported values for otherwise healthy older groups per se. Thus, there is a need for greater exploration of upper and lower body functional capacity in otherwise healthy individuals to better understand the effects of ageing. The large decrease in VO2peak for both exercise modes between the decades of 40–49 and 50–59 yrs warrant further consideration. There were fewer studies found reporting VO2peak for ACE and CE in the same participants for ages above 40 yrs when compared to below 40 yrs (i.e. 8/56 data sets for males and 9/70 data sets from all studies), with only one study included specifically within the 40–49 yrs category for men Table 5 Summary of linear fit statistics for absolute (above) and relative VO2peak (below) against age for included studies of men and women. M C R R2 Equivalent decrease per 10 years Absolute VO2peak (l⋅min 1) Male ACE 0.0190 2.8855 0.552 0.305 0.19 CE 0.0276 4.1294 0.534 0.285 0.28 Female ACE 0.0162 1.8970 0.649 0.420 0.16 CE 0.0341 3.2543 0.633 0.400 0.34 Relative VO2peak (ml⋅kg 1⋅min 1) Male ACE 0.3130 37.606 0.652 0.425 3.1 CE 0.4882 55.764 0.670 0.449 4.8 Female ACE 0.4121 36.263 0.864 0.747 4.1 CE 0.6529 55.834 0.735 0.540 6.5 M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 11 (Bhambhani et al., 1991). The mean age of participants within this particular study was 41.0  4.7 years, indicating that participants were likely physiologically closer to those in the 30–39 yrs group than those in the 50–59 yrs group, which is consistent with similar VO2peak values for both modes in these age categories. Therefore, when considering the available data, VO2peak for ACE and CE for 30–39 yrs and 40–49 yrs appear similar. Nevertheless, a considerable gap in knowledge exists regarding typical values of VO2peak for participants of 40 years of age and above. Such a gap in the literature requires attention as the importance of midlife cardiorespiratory fitness on longevity and reduced individual health care costs has recently been highlighted (Hansen et al., 2019). It is important though to note that the large decrease in VO2peak for ACE and CE between 40–49 and 50–59 yrs more likely reflects a lack of available data rather than anything physiological in nature. 4.2. Sex differences There were considerably fewer studies reporting VO2peak during both ACE and CE for women (n ˆ 14) when compared to men (n ˆ 56); but with a similar proportion of those within the 20–29 yrs age category (~70 %) for both sexes. The estimated decreases in VO2peak per decade during ACE for women were similar to those for men (i.e. 0.16 and 0.19 l.min 1; 3.5 and 3.1 ml.kg 1.min 1, respectively), whereas the de- creases in VO2peak for CE in women were greater than for men (i.e. 0.34 Fig. 3. Weighted means and pooled standard deviations for absolute (a) and relative (b) peak oxygen uptake in men. M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 12 and 0.28 l.min 1; 6.5 and 4.8 ml.kg 1.min 1, respectively). Further- more, when the decrease in VO2peak per decade for women was considered in relation to values at 20–29 yrs, the decreases observed for CE (absolute; 16.4 %, relative 16.3 %) were greater than for ACE (ab- solute; 10.7 %, relative; 13.4 %). The lesser decrease in VO2peak during ACE with age for women may represent a relatively lower training status of the upper body compared to the lower body in comparison to men. However, decreases in VO2peak for both modes of exercise for women were of a greater magnitude than for men (Absolute VO2peak ~ 8 %, relative VO2peak ~ 10 %). These data therefore suggest that not only is the decrease in VO2peak for females generally greater than for males for both exercise modes, but difference also exist between modes for females. Only one study was obtained for women within the <20 yrs age group (Muraki et al., 2004). In this study, the relative value for VO2peak (31 ml.kg. 1 min 1) was greater than any of the studies contributing to the 20–29 yrs age category (range: 18–28 ml.kg. 1min. 1) and the ab- solute value for VO2peak (1.74 l.min 1) was similar to the largest values in the category (range: 1.05 to 1.77 l.min 1). The corresponding VO2peak for CE was also relatively high at 44 ml.kg. 1min. 1 and similar to values for the equivalent male age group, likely reflecting that some of the population were ‘physically active’ (Muraki et al., 2004). Never- theless, although these VO2peak values suggest a greater training status than that reported by the other authors, the ACE value was still 70 % of CE, and likely representative of values for non-specifically trained, but physically active females. 4.3. Heterogeneity 4.3.1. Between studies Assessment of heterogeneity is an important component of system- atic reviews and meta-analyses (Page et al., 2022). The I2 values re- ported here indicate a substantial amount of heterogeneity across studies, and much greater than previously reported (~60 %) (Larsen et al., 2016). Greater variation may be expected due to differences in training status across samples, even when the included studies partici- pants were reported or recruited as ‘non-specifically trained’. Both ACE and CE yielded overall coefficients of variation for VO2peak of ~14 % (e. g. for men), indicating similar variation for both exercise modes. Although studies of trained individuals were excluded, there was still a Fig. 4. The relationship between relative VO2peak (ml⋅kg 1⋅min 1) and age for men (a) and women (b). M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 13 Fig. 5. The relationship between absolute VO2peak (l⋅min 1) (above) and relative VO2peak (ml⋅kg 1⋅min 1) (below) against age for men above and below the age of 50 yrs. M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 14 considerable range of values for VO2peak, especially for men where more studies fitted the review inclusion criteria. For example, for the 20–29 yrs age category the range of relative VO2peak values for ACE was 21–40 ml.kg. 1min. 1 and greater than for women (i.e. 21–31 ml. kg. 1min. 1). The data for men was normally distributed with 66 % of VO2peak values for ACE within one standard deviation of the mean (i.e. relative VO2peak: 28 to 36 ml.kg. 1min. 1, absolute VO2peak: 2.1 to 2.7 l. min 1). Values for absolute VO2peak during ACE for trained individuals, such as elite paddlers (Tesch, 1983) are much greater than in the present study (4.30 and 2.42 l.min. 1, respectively) as indeed are values for unskilled paddlers or those with a range of skill levels (Pendergast et al., 1979) (2.90 and 2.82 l.min 1; respectively). Furthermore, even with 6 to 8 weeks ACE endurance training in previously untrained participants resulting in significant improvements in VO2peak during ACE in young (27 yrs; 27 to 32 ml.kg. 1 min 1) (Bottoms and Price, 2014) and older participants (65 yrs; 17 to 22 ml.kg. 1 min 1) (Hill et al., 2018a), VO2peak values are still within the range of values reported in the current study. In addition, the overall mean VO2peak for CE was 46 ml. kg. 1min. 1 but with its distribution skewed towards the lesser trained values at 40–44 ml.kg. 1min. 1 and only eight values above 50 ml.kg. 1 min 1. Thus, we are confident that the range of VO2peak values within the data analysed are indeed representative of the desired inclusion criteria, but likely represents a source of heterogeneity across studies. Variation between studies decreased in the older age categories, most likely in part due to the smaller number of available studies. The most likely factors affecting heterogeneity between studies, other than differences in the actual sample populations, could relate to the exercise protocols undertaken to elicit VO2peak. Within ACE pro- tocols the most likely differences between studies relate to crank rate and continuous or discontinuous protocol design. Little difference has generally been reported for VO2peak values during ACE achieved using continuous and discontinuous protocols (Sawka et al., 1983) whereas significant effects have been consistently observed for crank rate. Although differences in VO2peak during ACE are evident between pro- tocols utilising 60 and 70 rev.min 1 (e.g. 0.2 l.min 1, 3 ml.kg. 1min. 1) (Price and Campbell, 1997b) they are not as great as those between 50 and 70 rev.min 1 (e.g. 0.37 l.min 1; 5 ml.kg. 1min. 1) (Price et al., 2007). However, many of the studies reviewed often reported faster cadences for ACE than CE protocols (i.e. 60 or 70 rev.min 1) so, although differences may exist between studies due to crank rate these are still likely less than or similar to those considered as small based on Hedges g analysis (e.g. 35 vs 32 ml.kg. 1min. 1, g ˆ 0.39) and certainly less than those considered of ‘medium’ or ‘large’ importance between age categories. 4.3.2. Within studies The variation in VO2peak within studies relates to variability of the sample and thus variability of participants undertaking the same exer- cise protocol. Key contributors to variability include diurnal as well as day to day variation (i.e. reliability or repeatability of VO2peak values) and training status. Studies evaluating the reliability of VO2peak during ACE have shown similar variability for ACE protocols of 2–3 % utilising cadences of 50 (Bar-Or and Zwiren, 1975) and 60 rev.min 1 (Price and Campbell, 1997b). Thus, for typical VO2peak values during ACE for the 20–29 and 60–69 yrs age groups (i.e. 33 and 20 ml.kg. 1min. 1, respectively) a 3 % difference represents ~1 and < 1 ml.kg. 1min. 1, respectively, and is within the expected and acceptable measurement error for VO2peak during ACE (Smith and Price, 2007). Similarly, vari- ability for CE using similar protocols to those in the included studies is ~4 % (Dideriksen and Mikkelsen, 2017), representing 2 and 1 ml. kg. 1min. 1 for the equivalent age categories above. Furthermore, circadian variation for maximal oxygen uptake is not generally observed (Deschenes et al., 1998) and in agreement with a reduced circadian ef- fect in greater intensities of exercise (Reilly, 2007). When combined such variability components may thus be considered relatively small and not the major contributor to heterogeneity. 4.4. Ratio between peak oxygen uptake during ACE and CE When considering the ratio between ACE:CE for VO2peak the mean value across all ages was 0.70, with a difference in VO2peak between ACE and CE of 13 ml.kg. 1min. 1 (0.93 l.min 1) both values being similar to those reported by Larsen et al. (Larsen et al., 2016), i.e. 0.70 and 12.5 ml.kg. 1.min. 1, respectively. However, when considered with respect to the different age categories, the ACE:CE for VO2peak was greatest (0.73) for the youngest age category (<20 yrs) decreasing steadily by 20–29 years (0.70) to 40–49 yrs (0.66). Thereafter, the ratio increased at 50–59 yrs (0.70) before stabilising in the two oldest groups (0.72). A greater ratio for ACE:CE suggests that VO2peak from ACE represents a greater proportion of the CE value. Thus, VO2peak values during CE were similar between <20 yrs to 30–39 groups (48 vs. 46 ml.kg. 1min. 1), whereas VO2peak during ACE was greatest for the <20 yrs group implying that upper body functional capacity is relatively greater at this age. From this point onwards however, VO2peak during ACE decreased steadily until 30-39 yrs (36 to 28 ml.kg. 1min. 1, respectively) and to a greater extent than CE. Therefore, ACE is likely a valuable and effective exercise mode to aid in the development of cardiovascular fitness in younger ages which may enable retention of whole-body functional capacity in later years. Larsen et al. (Larsen et al., 2016) observed that the difference be- tween VO2peak during ACE and CE was associated with both age and aerobic capacity. More specifically, the difference between modes was reduced with age and increased with better aerobic capacity. Indeed, our data suggest that the ratio decreases with age up to 40–49 yrs, before increasing at 50–59 and 60–69 before plateauing. As noted earlier, this latter plateau likely represents the older participants who volunteered to take part in the studies representing fitter members of the population (Fleg et al., 1995). Furthermore, two further data sets were identified for the <20 years category but involved standing ACE, so were excluded (Stamford et al., 1978). These groups consequently elicited greater VO2peak during ACE and thus a greater ACE:CE of ~0.87, supporting the sensitivity of the ratio to greater VO2peak during ACE. Thus, the current data give more specific age-related insight into the relationship between age and VO2peak during ACE and CE. 4.5. Excluded studies 4.5.1. Abstract only studies Two studies were excluded due to being abstract only (Hernandez- Murua et al., 2017; Shakespeare and Parr, 2020). More specifically, Hernandez-Murua et al. (Hernandez-Murua et al., 2017) was the only Fig. 6. Ratio between VO2peak during arm crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CE) in men. M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 15 study initially sourced within the 40–49 years of age category for women and its omission strengthens the finding of little or no data within that age group for women. Although the values for VO2peak from this study did not directly lie on the regression equations their omission did not affect the relationships obtained. A second abstract (Shakespeare and Parr, 2020) provided mean values for oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold and as a percentage of relative VO2peak for both exercise modes in a combined group of men and women. Firstly, the data could not be separated based on sex alone, and although mean values could be estimated, standard deviations could not, and therefore these results could not be incorporated into the weighted mean and standard deviation calculations. Omission of these studies however, is unlikely to affect the overall conclusions of the current review. 4.5.2. Combined data sets Of the studies potentially included within the review 14 (repre- senting 15 data sets) presented results either as; specific samples of men and women as well as these participants combined as a whole sample, or one combined group of men and women whose data could not be separated based on sex. Five of these studies (Kang et al., 1998; Marterer et al., 2020; Aminoff et al., 1999; Barstow et al., 1993; Mitropoulos et al., 2017) reflected the former and were included in the separate data analyses for men and women. Of the remaining nine studies, one did not identify the sex of participants (Charbonnier et al., 1975) and eight presented data that could not be divided into separate data sets for men or women (Hill et al., 2018a; McKeough et al., 2003; Sedlock, 1991; Keyser et al., 1989; Alison et al., 1998; Castro et al., 2011; Loughney et al., 2014; Franssen et al., 2002) and were thus excluded. Where such data sets were combined these tended to be older (39  4 yrs) with slightly larger sample sizes (n ˆ 12) with a distribution of ~52 % men to 48 % women. Importantly most studies were within the 20–29 or 60–69 yrs age groups which still represents a lack of data for middle aged participants. Future studies presenting combined data for men and women should do so to enable separate analysis where possible. 4.5.3. Exercise mode A small number of studies were excluded due to comparing VO2peak during ACE with treadmill running (Helgerud et al., 2019). Although VO2peak during ACE was similar in excluded studies to those reported in the current review for similar ages (i.e. 31 ml.kg. 1min. 1) treadmill- based VO2peak, as expected, was greater than for CE (51 ml. kg. 1min. 1) due to a greater active muscle mass. Corresponding ACE: TM ratios were thus lower than for ACE:CE at ~0.61, but slightly greater for upper body trained individuals (i.e. 0.66–0.71 for boxers and gym- nasts; Venckunas et al., 2022). Similarly, studies involving standing ACE were also excluded due to potentially increasing the active muscle mass associated with ACE. For example, both Stamford et al. (Stamford et al., 1978) and Nag et al. (Nag, 1984) observed greater ACE:CE with standing ACE (0.86 and 0.77, respectively) than for the overall mean reported in the current review. Standing and seated ACE protocols though do represent a range of vocational postures and should therefore be eval- uated more fully. 4.5.4. Training status Only one study was initially identified that directly compared VO2peak during ACE and CE across age groups (males aged 26 and 57 years of age) (Aminoff et al., 1999). Values for VO2peak for ACE and CE in the younger group were similar to the current study (ACE: 27 and 29 ml. kg. 1 min 1, CE: both 43 ml.kg. 1 min 1, respectively) and with lower values for CE in the older group (36 ml.kg. 1 min 1). Values for ACE though were similar for both younger and older participants (i.e. 27 and 25 ml.kg. 1 min 1, respectively) as a result of arm muscle mass being similar across groups. In addition, the CE values for the older partici- pants were larger than expected for the equivalent age category in the current study (36 vs. 28 ml.kg. 1 min 1, respectively) further suggesting a greater overall aerobic fitness status. As the older participant group was therefore likely more upper and lower body trained than may be expected for that age group, this study was excluded from the current review (in addition to using semi-upright cycling). The importance of this study, however, should be noted as physical performance with small muscle groups did not necessarily decrease with age where muscle mass was retained. The importance and relevance of maintaining upper body muscle mass for healthy ageing is further emphasized in the current study. 4.5.5. ACE only Two studies were identified that compared VO2peak across age groups but only during ACE (Balady et al., 1996; Groslambert et al., 2006). Balady et al. (Balady et al., 1996) compared men and women of 20–29, 30–39 and 40–59 years of age observing similar VO2peak across ages for males (~20–21 ml.kg. 1min. 1) and females (~15–16 ml.kg. 1min. 1) indicating no differences in aerobic fitness across age groups for either sex. As the VO2peak values for the two younger groups are considerably lower than expected from the current review, differences in aerobic fitness could be presumed. Gross Lambert et al. (Groslambert et al., 2006) reported VO2peak during ACE for females with mean ages of 23 and 75 years to be 24 and 11 ml.kg. 1min. 1, respectively. The current study obtained a VO2peak value of 26 ml.kg. 1 min 1 during ACE for the younger group, which is in agreement with that of Gross Lambert et al. Although no data was available for females of 60‡ years the linear regression equation generated for age and VO2peak during ACE in the current study predicts a value of 9 ml.kg. 1min. 1 for an equivalent older age, potentially validating our equation. Although these two studies were excluded, the data demonstrates consistency with the current study. 4.6. Methodological quality The mean scores for the methodological quality assessment indicated ‘good’ overall quality of reporting. Although there was a wide range of scores observed this has been reported previously, albeit in a different discipline (Desmeules et al., 2012). When quality scores for those studies common to both the current review and that of Larsen et al. (Larsen et al., 2016) were compared, we obtained similar overall scores (4.1 and 4.5, Larsen et al. and current study, respectively), evidencing consis- tency between studies. When considering the full range of methodo- logical questions posed, 87 % of studies or above indicated that the specific criteria were fulfilled, which is encouraging. However, only one half to two thirds of studies clearly discussed confounders, stated spe- cific inclusion and exclusion criteria or randomisation of trials. The two least reported criteria related to justification of sample size and reporting actual P values. Justification of sample size has also been noted to be poorly reported in both medical and dentistry studies (Tri- pathi et al., 2020) whereas reporting of exact P values is a relatively recent development in sport and exercise science. Although these are important factors, the key methodological aspect underpinning the validity and reliability of protocols and methods utilised in the included studies were generally well reported across studies. Thus, the quality of the data presented in each study included in the current review is likely to be of a high standard. 4.7. Limitations One potential limitation of the current review is examining changes in VO2peak in relation to ten-year age categories. For example, Rapp et al. (Rapp et al., 2018) noted that individuals at the younger and older ages of such categories can differ appreciably in their VO2peak values, particularly in older categories (e.g. VO2peak at 30 and 39 yrs; 34 and 30 ml.kg. 1 min 1, respectively, ~12 %; VO2peak at 50 and 59 yrs; 28 and 26 ml.kg. 1 min 1, respectively, ~7 %). Furthermore, there is no one specific age where functional capacity decreases in all individuals, which appears to be a predominantly individual phenomenon (Lazarus M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 16 et al., 2019). Thus, examining upper and lower body VO2peak responses in relation to underpinning physiological variables and behavioural factors known to interact with functional capacity is essential to better understand the cause and implications of whole-body ageing. The lim- itation of the literature regarding the lack of data for midlife age groups should also be acknowledged here. A second limitation of the current study is that a specific meta- regression was not undertaken. However, several key factors were considered to effectively answer the research question. Firstly, the magnitude of effect between weighted means for each age group were assessed for each exercise mode using Hedges g, thus addressing the effect of age. Secondly, studies incorporating data sets for men and women were considered separately, thus addressing the influence of sex. Thirdly, the study utilised stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus improving consistency across studies with respect to training status and exercise mode. We are therefore confident that this approach has pro- vided novel insights into the effect of age and sex on upper and lower body VO2peak. 4.8. Future work Although there were a substantial number of studies reporting VO2peak during both ACE and CE in younger participants, there is a clear lack of data from the age of 40 years onwards for both males and fe- males. Thus, one clear avenue for future work is to bridge this gap to allow for a clearer understanding of how upper body and lower body function changes with middle age. Such studies should ensure reporting both absolute and relative VO2peak alongside body composition and more specific estimates of upper and lower limb muscle mass to clearly understand changes in VO2peak with age. We strongly encourage development of a repository for individual data from such studies to be compiled facilitating larger studies which include and compare a wider range of ages. Future studies should further consider how the gross measures of functional capacity considered in this review (i.e. VO2peak) are associ- ated with activities of daily living. To our knowledge, only one study has examined how ACE and CE training regimes impact upon activities of daily living and measures of balance (Hill et al., 2018a). Here, both ACE and CE training elicited positive adaptations, but for different functional components. For example, ACE elicited improvements in forward reach and the control of medio-lateral body sway during upright stance whereas CE elicited improvements in lower body reach distance (star- excursion balance test) and control of antero-posterior body sway. The possibility of developing combined arm and leg ergometry training re- gimes could thus be considered to maximise adaptations and maintain a wider range of daily living activities. Threshold values for lower body VO2peak in relation to maintaining independent living of 18 ml.kg. 1min. 1 for men and 15 ml.kg. 1min. 1 for women at 80–85 years have been reported (Paterson et al., 1999). The current review established VO2peak values during ACE of 19, 19, 17 ml.kg. 1min. 1 for men at ages of between 50–59, 60–69 and 70–79 yrs, but with equivalent values for CE of 27, 28, 24 ml.kg. 1min. 1. Although the CE values from healthy individuals are greater than the suggested ‘threshold’ values for treadmill exercise no such functional capacity thresholds exist for ACE. Considering VO2peak values during ACE are much lower for clinical populations (e.g. Chronic fatigue syn- drome 10 ml.kg. 1.min 1 (Javierre et al., 2007), peripheral arterial disease 13 ml.kg. 1min. 1 (Zwierska et al., 2006), Parkinson's disease 15 ml.kg. 1min. 1 (Protas et al., 1996)) and that VO2peak during ACE has diagnostic worth (Ilias et al., 2009) greater information regarding pre-surgery values for ACE, in populations unable to exercise their lower body effectively, would certainly be of practical importance. 5. Conclusions This is the first review to consider changes in VO2peak during ACE and CE in the same participants in relation to both age and sex. Although the decrease in VO2peak during CE was consistent with other studies of age- related changes in lower body VO2peak, age-related decreases in VO2peak during ACE demonstrated a different pattern of responses and of a greater proportion of functional capacity. Importantly, examining ab- solute and relative measures of VO2peak for both exercise modes resulted in different age-related profiles when considered below 50 years of age, likely due to increases in body mass and changes in body composition. To further our understanding of whole body ageing more data is required for participants in mid and later life. The association between VO2peak and underlying physiological factors with age needs to be studied further, particularly in conjunction with activities of daily living and independent living. Support There were no sources of financial or non-financial support for this review. CRediT authorship contribution statement M.J. Price: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Method- ology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. P.M. Smith: Validation, Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing. L.M. Bottoms: Validation, Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing. M.W. Hill: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Formal analysis, Data curation. Declaration of competing interest MP, PS, LB and MH declare that they have no conflict of interest. Data availability All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. References Alison, J.A., Regnis, J.A., Donnelly, P.M., Adams, R.D., Sullivan, C.E., Bye, P.T., 1998. End-expiratory lung volume during arm and leg exercise in normal subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 158 (5 Pt 1), 1450–1458 (Nov). Aminoff, T., Smolander, J., Korhonen, O., Louhevaara, V., 1999. Physiological strain during kitchen work in relation to maximal and task-specific peak values. Ergonomics 42 (4), 584–592 (Apr). Ara, I., Larsen, S., Stallknecht, B., Guerra, B., Morales-Alamo, D., Andersen, J.L., et al., 2011. Normal mitochondrial function and increased fat oxidation capacity in leg and arm muscles in obese humans. Int. J. Obes. 35 (1), 99–108 (Jan). Aschenbach, W., Ocel, J., Craft, L., Ward, C., Spangenburg, E., Williams, J., 2000. Effect of oral sodium loading on high-intensity arm ergometry in college wrestlers. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32 (3), 669–675 (Mar). Astrand, I., Astrand, P.O., Hallback, I., Kilbom, A., 1973. Reduction in maximal oxygen uptake with age. J. Appl. Physiol. 35 (5), 649–654 (Nov). Avers, D., Brown, M., Chui, K.K., Wong, R.A., Lusardi, M., 2011. Use of the term “elderly”. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 34 (4). Balady, G.J., Jette, D., Scheer, J., Downing, J., 1996. Changes in exercise capacity following cardiac rehabilitation in patients stratified according to age and gender. Results of the Massachusetts Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Multicenter Database. J. Cardpulm. Rehabil. 16 (1), 38–46. Bar-Or, O., Zwiren, L.D., 1975. Maximal oxygen consumption test during arm exercise—reliability and validity. J. Appl. Physiol. 38 (3), 424–426 (Mar). Barstow, T.J., Casaburi, R., Wasserman, K., 1993. O2 uptake kinetics and the O2 deficit as related to exercise intensity and blood lactate. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 75 (2), 755–762 (Aug). Baumgart, J.K., Brurok, B., Sandbakk, Ø., 2018. Peak oxygen uptake in Paralympic sitting sports: a systematic literature review, meta- and pooled-data analysis. PLoS One 13 (2), 1–25. Bhambhani, Y.N., 1995. Prediction of stroke volume during upper and lower body exercise in men and women. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 76 (8), 713–718 (Aug). Bhambhani, Y.N., Eriksson, P., Gomes, P.S., 1991. Transfer effects of endurance training with the arms and legs. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 23 (9), 1035–1041 (Sep). M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 17 Bhambhani, Y., Maikala, R., Buckley, S., 1998. Muscle oxygenation during incremental arm and leg exercise in men and women. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 78 (5), 422–431 (Oct). Bohnert, B., Ward, S.A., Whipp, B.J., 1998. Effects of prior arm exercise on pulmonary gas exchange kinetics during high-intensity leg exercise in humans. Exp. Physiol. 83 (4), 557–570 (Jul). Bottoms, L., Price, M., 2014. The effect of arm training on thermoregulatory responses and calf volume during upper body exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 114 (6), 1113–1122 (Jun). Carter, R., Holiday, D.B., Stocks, J., Tiep, B., 2003. Peak physiologic responses to arm and leg ergometry in male and female patients with airflow obstruction. Chest 124 (2), 511–518 (Aug). Castro, R.R.T., Pedrosa, S., Nobrega, A.C.L., 2011. Different ventilatory responses to progressive maximal exercise test performed with either the arms or legs. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 66 (7), 1137–1142. Chan, A.K., Ilias-Khan, N.A., Xian, H., Inman, C., Martin WH3., 2011. Arm exercise stress perfusion imaging predicts clinical outcome. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 111 (6), 1546–1553 (Dec). Charbonnier, J.P., Lacour, J.R., Riffat, J., Flandrois, R., 1975. Experimental study of the performance of competition swimmers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 34 (3), 157–167 (Aug 15). Davies, C.T., Few, J., Foster, K.G., Sargeant, A.J., 1974. Plasma catecholamine concentration during dynamic exercise involving different muscle groups. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 32 (3), 195–206 (Mar 28). Davis, J.A., Vodak, P., Wilmore, J.H., Vodak, J., Kurtz, P., 1976. Anaerobic threshold and maximal aerobic power for three modes of exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 41 (4), 544–550 (Oct). Deeks, J.J., Higgins, J., Altmanm, D.G., 2022. Chapter 10: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M.J., et al. (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3. Dekerle, J., Dupont, L., Caby, I., Marais, G., Vanvelcenaher, J., Lavoie, J.M., et al., 2002. Ventilatory thresholds in arm and leg exercises with spontaneously chosen crank and pedal rates. Percept. Mot. Skills 95 (3 Pt 2), 1035–1046 (Dec). Deschenes, M.R., Sharma, J.V., Brittingham, K.T., Casa, D.J., Armstrong, L.E., Maresh, C. M., 1998. Chronobiological effects on exercise performance and selected physiological responses. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 77 (3), 249–256 (Feb). Desmeules, F., Roy, J.S., MacDermid, J.C., Champagne, F., Hinse, O., Woodhouse, L.J., 2012. Advanced practice physiotherapy in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 13, 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 1471-2474-13-107. Dideriksen, K., Mikkelsen, U.R., 2017. Reproducibility of incremental maximal cycle ergometer tests in healthy recreationally active subjects. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 37 (2), 173–182 (Mar). Downs, S.H., Black, N., 1998. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 52 (6), 377–384 (Jun). Fleg, J.L., O’Connor, F., Gerstenblith, G., Becker, L.C., Clulow, J., Schulman, S.P., et al., 1995. Impact of age on the cardiovascular response to dynamic upright exercise in healthy men and women. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 78 (3), 890–900 (Mar). Franklin, B.A., Vander, L., Wrisley, D., Rubenfire, M., 1983. Aerobic requirements of arm ergometry: implications for exercise testing and training. Phys. Sportsmed. 11 (10), 81–90 (Oct). Franssen, F.M.E., Wouters, E.F.M., Baarends, E.M., Akkermans, M.A., Schols, A.M.W.J., 2002. Arm mechanical efficiency and arm exercise capacity are relatively preserved in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 34 (10), 1570–1576 (Oct). Groslambert, A., Grange, C.C., Perrey, S., Maire, J., Tordi, N., Rouillon, J.D., 2006. Effects of aging on perceived exertion and pain during arm cranking in women 70 to 80 years old. J. Sports Sci. Med. 5 (2), 208–214 (Jun 1). Hansen, G.M., Marott, J.L., Holtermann, A., Gyntelberg, F., Lange, P., Jensen, M.T., 2019. Midlife cardiorespiratory fitness and the long-term risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 74 (9), 843–848 (Sep). Harb, S.C., Wang, T.K.M., Cremer, P.C., Wu, Y., Cho, L., Menon, V., et al., 2021. Associations between cardiorespiratory fitness, sex and long term mortality amongst adults undergoing exercise treadmill testing. Int. J. Cardiol. 342, 103–107 (Nov 1). Helge, J.W., Klein, D.K., Andersen, T.M., van Hall, G., Calbet, J., Boushel, R., et al., 2011. Interleukin-6 release is higher across arm than leg muscles during whole-body exercise. Exp. Physiol. 96 (6), 590–598. Helgerud, J., Øiestad, B.E., Wang, E., Hoff, J., 2019. Prediction of upper extremity peak oxygen consumption from heart rate during submaximal arm cycling in young and middle-aged adults. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 119 (11 12), 2589–2598 (Dec). Herdy, A.H., Uhlendorf, D., 2011. Reference values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing for sedentary and active men and women. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 96 (1), 54–59 (Jan). Hernandez-Murua, J.A., Romero-Perez, E.M., Salazar-Landeros, M.M., Avenda~no- Soto, M.A., Mauricio, A., Verdugo-Balbuena, C., De Paz Fernandez, J.A, 2017. VO2peak and Watt exercise testing: arm crank vs cycle ergometry. International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings 13 (1). Available at: https://dig italcommons.wku.edu/ijesab/vol13/iss1/7. Hill, M.W., Goss-Sampson, M., Duncan, M.J., Price, M.J., 2014. The effects of maximal and submaximal arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry on postural sway. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 14 (8), 782–790. Hill, M., Oxford, S., Duncan, M., Price, M., 2018a. Arm-crank training improves postural stability and physical functioning in older people. Exp. Gerontol. 113, 218–227 (Nov). Hill, M., Talbot, C., Puddiford, M., Price, M., 2018b. Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 118 (5), 1011–1019 (May). Hill, M., Walsh, S., Talbot, C., Price, M., Duncan, M., 2019. Exercise intensity-dependent effects of arm and leg-cycling on cognitive performance. PLoS One 14 (10), e0224092 (Oct 21). Hill, M., Puddiford, M., Talbot, C., Price, M., 2020. The validity and reproducibility of perceptually regulated exercise responses during combined arm ‡ leg cycling. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 120 (10), 2203–2212. Ilias, N.A., Xian, H., Inman, C., Martin, W.H., 2009. Arm exercise testing predicts clinical outcome. Am. Heart J. 157 (1), 69–76 (Jan). Javierre, C., Alegre, J., Ventura, J.L., García-Quintana, A., Segura, R., Suarez, A., et al., 2007. Physiological responses to arm and leg exercise in women patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 14 (1), 43–53 (Jan 1). Jensen-Urstad, M., Ahlborg, G., Sahlin, K., 1993. High lactate and NH3 release during arm vs. leg exercise is not due to beta-adrenoceptor stimulation. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 74 (6), 2860–2867 (Jun). Kang, J., Chaloupka, E.C., Mastrangelo, M.A., Donnelly, M.S., Martz, W.P., Robertson, R. J., 1998. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 78 (3), 241–246 (Aug). Keller, K., Engelhardt, M., 2014. Strength and muscle mass loss with aging process. Age and strength loss. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 3 (4), 346–350 (Feb 24). Keteyian, S.J., Marks, C.R., Levine, A.B., Kataoka, T., Fedel, F., Levine, T.B., 1994. Cardiovascular responses to submaximal arm and leg exercise in cardiac transplant patients. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 26 (4), 420–424 (Apr). Keyser, R.E., Mor, D., Andres, F.F., 1989. Cardiovascular responses and anaerobic threshold for bicycle and arm ergometer exercise. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 70 (9), 687–691 (Sep). Koppo, K., Bouckaert, J., Jones, A.M., 2002. Oxygen uptake kinetics during high- intensity arm and leg exercise. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 133 (3), 241–250 (Nov 19). Larsen, R.T., Christensen, J., Tang, L.H., Keller, C., Doherty, P., Zwisler, A., et al., 2016. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cardiopulmonary exercise test values obtained from the arm cycle and the leg cycle respectively in healthy adults. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 11 (7), 1006–1039 (Dec). Laukkanen, J.A., Kurl, S., Voutilainen, A., Makikallio, T., Kunutsor, S.K., 2022. Cardiorespiratory fitness, inflammation, and risk of sudden cardiac death in middle- aged men. Am. J. Cardiol. 174, 166–171 (Jul 1). Lazarus, N.R., Lord, J.M., Harridge, S.D.R., 2019. The relationships and interactions between age, exercise and physiological function. J. Physiol. 597 (5), 1299–1309 (Mar). Lewis, S., Thompson, P., Areskog, N.H., Vodak, P., Marconyak, M., DeBusk, R., et al., 1980. Transfer effects of endurance training to exercise with untrained limbs. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 44 (1), 25–34. Loughney, L., West, M., Pintus, S., Lythgoe, D., Clark, E., Jack, S., et al., 2014. Comparison of oxygen uptake during arm or leg cardiopulmonary exercise testing in vascular surgery patients and control subjects. Br. J. Anaesth. 112 (1), 57–65 (Jan). Louhevaara, V., Sovijarvi, A., Ilmarinen, J., Teraslinna, P., 1990. Differences in cardiorespiratory responses during and after arm crank and cycle exercise. Acta Physiol. Scand. 138 (2), 133–143 (Feb). Lyons, S., Richardson, M., Bishop, P., Smith, J., Heath, H., Giesen, J., 2007. Excess post- exercise oxygen consumption in untrained men following exercise of equal energy expenditure: comparisons of upper and lower body exercise. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 9 (6), 889–894 (Nov). Magel, J.R., McArdle, W.D., Toner, M., Delio, D.J., 1978. Metabolic and cardiovascular adjustment to arm training. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 45 (1), 75–79 (Jul). Maresh, C.M., Sokmen, B., Kraemer, W.J., Hoffman, J.R., Watson, G., Judelson, D.A., et al., 2006. Pituitary-adrenal responses to arm versus leg exercise in untrained man. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 97 (4), 471–477 (Jul). Marterer, N., Menz, V., Amin, S., Faulhaber, M., 2020. 6-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) of the lower extremities improves VO2max of the upper extremities. Int. J. Sports Med. 41 (6), 380–390. McKeough, Z.J., Alison, J.A., Bye, P.T.P., 2003. Arm exercise capacity and dyspnea ratings in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Cardpulm. Rehabil. 23 (3), 218–225. Miles, D.S., Sawka, M.N., Glaser, R.M., Petrofsky, J.S., 1983. Plasma volume shifts during progressive arm and leg exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 54 (2), 491–495. Mitropoulos, A., Gumber, A., Crank, H., Klonizakis, M., 2017. Validation of an arm crank ergometer test for use in sedentary adults. J. Sports Sci. Med. 16 (4), 558–564. Muraki, S., Tsunawake, N., Yamasaki, M., 2004. Limitation of muscle deoxygenation in the triceps during incremental arm cranking in women. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 91 (2–3), 246–252 (Mar). Nag, P.K., 1984. Circulo-respiratory responses to different muscular exercises. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 52 (4), 393–399. Nevin, J., Smith, P., Waldron, M., Patterson, S., Price, M., Hunt, A., et al., 2018. Efficacy of an 8-week concurrent strength and endurance training program on hand cycling performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 32 (7), 1861–1868 (Jul). NHLBI 2. Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardio vascular-risk-reduction/tools/cohort. (Accessed 28 May 2015). Ogata, H., Yano, T., 2005. Kinetics of oxygen uptake during arm cranking with the legs inactive or exercising at moderate intensities. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 94 (1–2), 17–24 (May). M.J. Price et al. Experimental Gerontology 190 (2024) 112427 18 Orr, J.L., Williamson, P., Anderson, W., Ross, R., McCafferty, S., Fettes, P., 2013. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: arm crank vs cycle ergometry. Anaesthesia 68 (5), 497–501 (May). Page, M.J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al., 2021. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n160 (Mar 29). Page, M.J., Higgins, J., Sterne, J., 2022. Chapter 13: assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis. In: Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M.J., et al. (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3. Paterson, D.H., Cunningham, D.A., Koval, J.J., St Croix, C.M., 1999. Aerobic fitness in a population of independently living men and women aged 55-86 years. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 31 (12), 1813–1820 (Dec). Pendergast, D., Cerretelli, P., Rennie, D.W., 1979. Aerobic and glycolytic metabolism in arm exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 47 (4), 754–760 (Oct). Pimental, N.A., Sawka, M.N., Billings, D.S., Trad, L.A., 1984. Physiological responses to prolonged upper-body exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 16 (4), 360–365 (Aug). Pivarnik, J.M., Grafner, T.R., Elkins, E.S., 1988. Metabolic, thermoregulatory, and psychophysiological responses during arm and leg exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 20 (1), 1–5 (Feb). Pogliaghi, S., Terziotti, P., Cevese, A., Balestreri, F., Schena, F., 2006. Adaptations to endurance training in the healthy elderly: arm cranking versus leg cycling. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 97 (6), 723–731 (Aug). Price, M.J., Campbell, I.G., 1997a. Thermoregulatory responses of paraplegic and able- bodied athletes at rest and during prolonged upper body exercise and passive recovery. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 76 (6), 552–560. Price, M.J., Campbell, I.G., 1997b. Determination of peak oxygen uptake during upper body exercise. Ergonomics 40 (4), 491–499 (Apr). Price, M.J., Collins, L., Smith, P.M., Goss-Sampson, M., 2007. The effects of cadence and power output upon physiological and biomechanical responses to incremental arm- crank ergometry. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 32 (4), 686–692 (Aug). Price, M., Beckford, C., Dorricott, A., Hill, C., Kershaw, M., Singh, M., et al., 2014. Oxygen uptake during upper body and lower body Wingate anaerobic tests. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 39 (12), 1345–1351 (Dec). Price, M., Bottoms, L., Hill, M., Eston, R., 2022. Maximal fat oxidation during incremental upper and lower body exercise in healthy young males. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (22), 15311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215311 (Nov 19). Protas, E.J., Stanley, R.K., Jankovic, J., MacNeill, B., 1996. Cardiovascular and metabolic responses to upper- and lower-extremity exercise in men with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Phys. Ther. 76 (1), 34–40 (Jan). Rapp, D., Scharhag, J., Wagenpfeil, S., Scholl, J., 2018. Reference values for peak oxygen uptake: cross-sectional analysis of cycle ergometry-based cardiopulmonary exercise tests of 10090 adult German volunteers from the Prevention First Registry. BMJ Open 8 (3), e018697. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018697. Reilly, T., 2007. Circadian rhythms. In: Winter, E.M., Jones, A.J., Davison, R.C.R., Bromley, P.D., Mercer, T.H. (Eds.), Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines, The British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences Guide. Volume II: Exercise and Clinical Testing. Routledge, London, pp. 54–60. Reybrouck, T., Heigenhauser, G.F., Faulkner, J.A., 1975. Limitations to maximum oxygen uptake in arms, leg, and combined arm-leg ergometry. J. Appl. Physiol. 38 (5), 774–779 (May). Rosler, K., Hoppeler, H., Conley, K.E., Claassen, H., Gehr, P., Howald, H., 1985. Transfer effects in endurance exercise. Adaptations in trained and untrained muscles. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 54 (4), 355–362. Sargeant, A.J., Davies, C.T., 1973. Perceived exertion during rhythmic exercise involving different muscle masses. J. Hum. Ergol. (Tokyo) 2 (1), 3–11 (Sep). Sawka, M.N., Foley, M.E., Pimental, N.A., Toner, M.M., Pandolf, K.B., 1983. Determination of maximal aerobic power during upper-body exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 54 (1), 113–117 (Jan). Sawka, M.N., Pimental, N.A., Pandolf, K.B., 1984. Thermoregulatory responses to upper body exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 52 (2), 230–234. Saxton, J.M., Zwierska, I., Hopkinson, K., Espigares, E., Choksy, S., Nawaz, S., et al., 2008. Effect of upper- and lower-limb exercise training on circulating soluble adhesion molecules, hs-CRP and stress proteins in patients with intermittent claudication. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 35 (5), 607–613 (May). Schneider, D.A., Wing, A.N., Morris, N.R., 2002. Oxygen uptake and heart rate kinetics during heavy exercise: a comparison between arm cranking and leg cycling. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 88 (1–2), 100–106 (Nov). Sedlock, D.A., 1991. Postexercise energy expenditure following upper body exercise/La depense energetique posterieure a un exercice de la partie superieure du corps. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 62 (2), 213–216. Shakespeare, J., Parr, D.G., 2020. Comparison of anaerobic threshold obtained using arm and leg cycle ergometry. Eur. Respir. J. 56, 3199. https://doi.org/10.1183/ 13993003.congress-2020.3199. Sharp, M.A., Harman, E., Vogel, J.A., Knapik, J.J., Legg, S.J., 1988. Maximal aerobic capacity for repetitive lifting: comparison with three standard exercise testing modes. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 57 (6), 753–760. Shephard, R.J., 2009. Maximal oxygen intake and independence in old age. Br. J. Sports Med. 43 (5), 342–346 (May). Shiomi, T., Maruyama, Saito A., Umemura, M., 2000. Physiological responses and mechanical efficiency during different types of ergometric exercise. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 12 (1), 67–73. Smith, P.M., Price, M.J., 2007. Upper body exercise. In: Winter, E.M., Jones, A.M., Davidson, R.C.R., Bromley, P.D., Mercer, T.H. (Eds.), Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines, The British Association of Sports and Exercise Sciences Guide. Volume One, Sports Testing. Routledge, London, pp. 138–144. Sporer, B.C., Foster, G.E., Sheel, A.W., McKenzie, D.C., 2007. Entrainment of breathing in cyclists and non-cyclists during arm and leg exercise. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 155 (1), 64–70 (Jan 15). Stamford, B.A., Cuddihee, R.W., Moffatt, R.J., Rowland, R., 1978. Task specific changes in maximal oxygen uptake resulting from arm versus leg training. Ergonomics 21 (1), 1–9 (Jan). Suurmond, R., van Rhee, H., Hak, A., 2017. Introduction, comparison and validation of Meta Essentials: a free and simple tool for meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods 8 (4), 537–553 (Dec). Swensen, T., Mancuso, P., Howley, E.T., 1993. The effect of moderate resistance weight training on peak arm aerobic power. Int. J. Sports Med. 14 (1), 43–47 (Jan). Tesch, P.A., 1983. Physiological characteristics of elite kayak paddlers. Can. J. Appl. Sport Sci. 8 (2), 87–91 (Jun). Tesch, P.A., Daniels, W.L., Sharp, D.S., 1982. Lactate accumulation in muscle and blood during submaximal exercise. Acta Physiol. Scand. 114 (3), 441–446 (Mar). Tiller, N.B., Campbell, I.G., Romer, L.M., 2019. Mechanical-ventilatory responses to peak and ventilation-matched upper- versus lower-body exercise in normal subjects. Exp. Physiol. 104 (6), 920–931. Toner, M.M., Sawka, M.N., Pandolf, K.B., 1984. Thermal responses during arm and leg and combined arm-leg exercise in water. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 56 (5), 1355–1360 (May). Tripathi, R., Khatri, N., Mamde, A., 2020. Sample size and sampling considerations in published clinical research articles. J. Assoc. Physicians India 68 (3), 14–18 (Mar). Turner, D.L., Hoppeler, H., Claassen, H., Vock, P., Kayser, B., Schena, F., et al., 1997. Effects of endurance training on oxidative capacity and structural composition of human arm and leg muscles. Acta Physiol. Scand. 161 (4), 459–464 (Dec). Venckunas, T., Bruzas, V., Stasiulis, A., Snieckus, A., Mockus, P., Kamandulis, S., 2022. Cardiorespiratory responses to specific and nonspecific exercise in high-profile amateur boxers. J. Strength Cond. Res. 36 (3), 717–722 (Mar 1). Warren, G.L., Cureton, K.J., Dengel, D.R., Graham, R.E., Ray, C.A., 1990. Is the gender difference in peak VO2 greater for arm than leg exercise? Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 60 (2), 149–154. Yasuda, N., Ruby, B.C., Gaskill, S.E., 2006. Substrate oxidation during incremental arm and leg exercise in men and women matched for ventilatory threshold. J. Sports Sci. 24 (12), 1281–1289 (Dec). Yasuda, N., Gaskill, S.E., Ruby, B.C., 2008. No gender-specific differences in mechanical efficiency during arm or leg exercise relative to ventilatory threshold. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 18 (2), 205–212 (Apr). Zwierska, I., Walker, R.D., Choksy, S.A., Male, J.S., Pockley, A.G., Saxton, J.M., 2006. Relative tolerance to upper- and lower-limb aerobic exercise in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 31 (2), 157–163 (Feb). M.J. Price et al.