Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreenhalgh, A
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, P J
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, J
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-16T16:55:14Z
dc.date.available2018-04-16T16:55:14Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-01
dc.identifier.citationGreenhalgh , A , Taylor , P J & Sinclair , J 2014 , ' The influence of different force and pressure measuring transducers on lower extremity kinematics measured during walking ' , Gait & Posture , vol. 40 , no. 3 , pp. 476-9 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.003
dc.identifier.issn0966-6362
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 11396786
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8f512a9f-311d-49e7-990f-fec737514358
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 24909580
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84904060613
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19985
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstractThe examination of synchronous three dimensional (3-D) kinetics and kinematics of walking in laboratory based analyses typically requires participants/patients to make foot contact with a force or pressure measuring device. However, it has been proposed that this may lead to targeting whereby participants modify their natural gait pattern in order to ensure contact with the device. This study aimed to determine the extent to which an embedded force plate (EFP) and two different pressure mats (PMs) affect natural gait kinematics. Male participants (n = 12, age 24.23 SD 4.22 years, height 1.74 m SD 0.10, mass 75.78 SD 6.90 kg) walked at a velocity of 1.25 ms(-1) along a 22 m walkway in four different conditions. (1) EFP, (2) FootScan (FS) PM, (3) MatScan (MS) PM, (4) no device (ND). 3-D angular kinematic parameters were collected using an eight camera motion analysis system. Differences in kinematics were examined using repeated measures ANOVAs. Significant differences were observed in hip abduction, knee flexion/extension and knee abduction between various conditions and may warrant consideration in future research. No significant differences were reported at the ankle joint in any conditions. Comparing the PMs, no significant differences were observed, however, significant differences between the MS and the EFP and ND conditions were identified. The research supports the efficacy of collecting gait kinematics at the ankle joint and in most variables measured at the knee and hip joints.en
dc.format.extent4
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGait & Posture
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAnkle Joint
dc.subjectBiomechanical Phenomena
dc.subjectFoot Joints
dc.subjectGait
dc.subjectHealthy Volunteers
dc.subjectHip Joint
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKnee Joint
dc.subjectLower Extremity
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMonitoring, Ambulatory
dc.subjectPressure
dc.subjectRange of Motion, Articular
dc.subjectRotation
dc.subjectTransducers
dc.subjectWalking
dc.subjectJournal Article
dc.titleThe influence of different force and pressure measuring transducers on lower extremity kinematics measured during walkingen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sport Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionExercise, Health and Wellbeing Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.003
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record