Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLees-Maffei, Grace
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-01T09:56:22Z
dc.date.available2007-10-01T09:56:22Z
dc.date.issued2001-09-01
dc.identifier.citationLees-Maffei , G 2001 , ' From Service to Self-Service: Advice Literature as Design Discourse, 1920–1970 ' , The Journal of Design History , vol. 14 , no. 3 , pp. 187-206 . https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/14.3.187
dc.identifier.issn1741-7279
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 103435
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 49a4b37b-02e0-4710-85c3-d8a681a2e7bc
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/768
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 34249139100
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7474-5118/work/32378742
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/768
dc.description© 2001 The Design History Society. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/14.3.187
dc.description.abstractThis article examines examples of advice literature published in Britain for what they indicate about changes in the material culture of home entertaining from 1920 to 1970. Advice writing offers ideal models of design consumption attentive to social behaviour and reflective of reader concerns. A theoretical framework for the fusion of the social and material in a domestic setting is forged through reference to the work of Norbert Elias, Erving Goffman and Pierre Bourdieu. Elia's 1939 work The Civilising Process illuminates pre-industrial etiquette, Goffman's 1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life bridges the movement away from such a model, and Bourdieu's 1969 Distinction assists understanding of the reception of modernist design. A pre-industrial courtly model of ornament and luxury apparently jarred with the comparative austerity embodied in 'high' modernism and popular idioms such as modern and contemporary. Modern design was recommended in advice literature, therefore, as contributing new ideals to the comfort of a social setting: flexibility, youth, practicality, thrift, hygiene, economies of space, fashionability and longevity. However, modernist design was also credited with the traditional etiquette ideals of dignity, luxury and comfort, pointing to a new appreciation of the beauty and utility grounded in the aestheticization of everyday life that modified the visual language of status and hospitality.en
dc.format.extent20
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Design History
dc.subjectadvice literature
dc.subjectdomestic space
dc.subjecthome entertaining
dc.subjecthousehold management
dc.subjectinterior design
dc.subjecttaste
dc.titleFrom Service to Self-Service: Advice Literature as Design Discourse, 1920–1970en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Creative Arts
dc.contributor.institutionHistory
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Humanities
dc.contributor.institutionArt and Design
dc.contributor.institutionTheorising Visual Art and Design
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/14.3.187
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record