Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBiggs, Michael
dc.contributor.editorNilsson, Fredrik
dc.contributor.editorDunin-Woyseth, Halina
dc.contributor.editorJanssens, Nels
dc.identifier.citationBiggs , M 2017 , Doctorateness: where should we look for evidence? in F Nilsson , H Dunin-Woyseth & N Janssens (eds) , Perspectives on Research Assessment in Architecture, Music and the Arts . Routledge , London .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 11208046
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3fd325c1-ac95-4576-86ca-800012085433
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85026269526
dc.descriptionMichael Biggs, ‘Doctorateness: where should we look for evidence?’, in Fredrik Nilsson, Halina Dunin-Woyseth, Nels Janssens, eds., Perspectives on Research Assessment in Architecture, Music and the Arts, (London: Routledge, 2017), ISBN 978-1138695573.
dc.description.abstractThis chapter considers the possibility of an “institutional theory of artistic research”. It proposes four distinct quadrants in which one might look for evidence for such a theory, which needs to have the capacity to accommodate the diverse positions on artistic research in the literature. The quadrants ("explicit", "implicit", "generic", and "specific") form a Boolean square with which one may also consider the contested term “doctorateness” in any field. The chapter concludes in due course, artistic research will gain a voice that causes researchers to re-describe activity in other disciplines owing to the way in which artistic research will be described.en
dc.relation.ispartofPerspectives on Research Assessment in Architecture, Music and the Arts
dc.titleDoctorateness: where should we look for evidence?en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Creative Arts
dc.contributor.institutionArt and Design
dc.contributor.institutionTheorising Visual Art and Design
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Creative Arts

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record