Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoombs, Maureen A
dc.contributor.authorDarlington, Anne-Sophie E
dc.contributor.authorLong-Sutehall, Tracy
dc.contributor.authorPattison, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Alison
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-09T15:55:36Z
dc.date.available2018-02-09T15:55:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-01
dc.identifier.citationCoombs , M A , Darlington , A-S E , Long-Sutehall , T , Pattison , N & Richardson , A 2017 , Transferring patients home to die : what is the potential population in UK critical care units? vol. 7 , 1 edn , BMJ Publishing Group . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000834
dc.identifier.isbn2045-435X
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC5339543
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6771-8733/work/62751770
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19765
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Most people when asked, express a preference to die at home, but little is known about whether this is an option for critically ill patients. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to describe the size and characteristics of the critical care population who could potentially be transferred home to die if they expressed such a wish. METHODS: Medical notes of all patients who died in, or within 5 days of discharge from seven critical care units across two hospital sites over a 12-month period were reviewed. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were developed and applied to identify the number of patients who had potential to be transferred home to die and demographic and clinical data (eg, conscious state, respiratory and cardiac support therapies) collected. RESULTS: 7844 patients were admitted over a 12-month period. 422 (5.4%) patients died. Using the criteria developed 100 (23.7%) patients could have potentially been transferred home to die. Of these 41 (41%) patients were diagnosed with respiratory disease. 53 (53%) patients were conscious, 47 (47%) patients were self-ventilating breathing room air/oxygen via a mask. 20 (20%) patients were ventilated via an endotracheal tube. 76 (76%) patients were not requiring inotropes/vasopressors. Mean time between discussion about treatment withdrawal and time of death was 36.4 h (SD=46.48). No patients in this cohort were transferred home. CONCLUSIONS: A little over 20% of patients dying in critical care demonstrate potential to be transferred home to die. Staff should actively consider the practice of transferring home as an option for care at end of life for these patients.en
dc.format.extent4
dc.format.extent853809
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.subjectCritical Care
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPatient Discharge
dc.subjectTerminal Care
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.subjectWithholding Treatment
dc.subjectJournal Article
dc.titleTransferring patients home to die : what is the potential population in UK critical care units?en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE)
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000834
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record