Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAshrafi, Parivash
dc.contributor.authorSun, Yi
dc.contributor.authorDavey, Neil
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Roderick
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Simon C
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Gary Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-10T18:38:26Z
dc.date.available2018-04-10T18:38:26Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-14
dc.identifier.citationAshrafi , P , Sun , Y , Davey , N , Adams , R , Wilkinson , S C & Moss , G P 2018 , ' Model fitting for small skin permeability data sets: hyperparameter optimisation in Gaussian Process Regression ' , Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology , vol. 70 , no. 3 , pp. 361-373 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12863
dc.identifier.issn0022-3573
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19964
dc.descriptionThis is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Parivash Ashrafi, Yi Sun, Neil Davey, Roderick G. Adams, Simon C. Wilkinson, and Gary Patrick Moss, ‘Model fitting for small skin permeability data sets: hyperparameter optimisation in Gaussian Process Regression’, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Vol. 70 (3): 361-373, March 2018, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12863. Under embargo until 17 January 2019. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study was to investigate how to improve predictions from Gaussian Process models by optimising the model hyperparameters. Methods Optimisation methods, including Grid Search, Conjugate Gradient, Random Search, Evolutionary Algorithm and Hyper-prior, were evaluated and applied to previously published data. Data sets were also altered in a structured manner to reduce their size, which retained the range, or ‘chemical space’ of the key descriptors to assess the effect of the data range on model quality. Key findings The Hyper-prior Smoothbox kernel results in the best models for the majority of data sets, and they exhibited significantly better performance than benchmark quantitative structure–permeability relationship (QSPR) models. When the data sets were systematically reduced in size, the different optimisation methods generally retained their statistical quality, whereas benchmark QSPR models performed poorly. Conclusions The design of the data set, and possibly also the approach to validation of the model, is critical in the development of improved models. The size of the data set, if carefully controlled, was not generally a significant factor for these models and that models of excellent statistical quality could be produced from substantially smaller data sets.en
dc.format.extent13
dc.format.extent1517190
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
dc.subjectGaussian process
dc.subjecthyperparameters
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectquantitative structure–permeability relationship
dc.subjectskin permeability
dc.subjectPharmacology
dc.subjectPharmaceutical Science
dc.titleModel fitting for small skin permeability data sets: hyperparameter optimisation in Gaussian Process Regressionen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Computer Science and Informatics Research
dc.contributor.institutionBiocomputation Research Group
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-01-17
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040724399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jphp.12863
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record