Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBourne, Craig
dc.contributor.authorCaddick Bourne, Emily
dc.contributor.editorBourne, Craig
dc.contributor.editorCaddick Bourne, Emily
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T11:31:37Z
dc.date.available2019-03-05T11:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-26
dc.identifier.citationBourne , C & Caddick Bourne , E 2018 , Conversational Perversion, Implicature and Sham Cancelling in Othello . in C Bourne & E Caddick Bourne (eds) , Routledge Companion to Shakespeare and Philosophy . Routledge , pp. 146-160 .
dc.identifier.isbn9781138936126
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 10760720
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: df3e91f1-2e9f-4bf6-9f4b-667dc7f6098c
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21177
dc.description.abstractOthello demonstrates what we call ‘conversational perversions’. This is a technical term which we introduce to identify conversational behaviours which are designed to block the possibility of mutual understanding that characterises successful communication. We believe that our notion of a conversational perversion can be put to work to illuminate conversational encounters in general, but here we show, in particular, how Othello furnishes examples of conversational perversions and, in turn, how the notion of a conversational perversion can be used to articulate a major driver of the play’s narrative: Iago’s manipulation of Othello. We explain the background, Gricean communicative framework, and how it relates to our framework for thinking about perversion. We illustrate our preferred account of perversion using the examples of sexual sadism and sexual coyness. We explain how to extend this account of perversion to cover conversational coyness and sadism. Finally, we identify how Iago’s (and Othello’s) ways of communicating exemplify these conversational perversions. In the course of this, we argue that Iago can be seen as making use of a perverted treatment of conversational implicatures, which we call ‘sham cancelling’.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.relation.ispartofRoutledge Companion to Shakespeare and Philosophy
dc.rights/dk/atira/pure/core/openaccesspermission/embargoed
dc.titleConversational Perversion, Implicature and Sham Cancelling in Othelloen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Humanities
dc.contributor.institutionPhilosophy
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-04-26
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315677019-7
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Humanities
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Accepted Version
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-04-26+01:00
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.date.embargo2020-04-26+01:00
herts.rights.accesstypeembargoedAccess


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record