Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRainer, A.
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, A.
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-04T13:29:16Z
dc.date.available2008-07-04T13:29:16Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationRainer , A & Pedersen , A 2004 , A partial replication of Thelin et al. s Usage Based Reading experiment . University of Hertfordshire .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 86731
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c350029c-04a5-4123-9a3a-ee7bb54c2aae
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/2182
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/2182
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we partially replicate Thelin et al. s investigation of usage based reading (UBR). Our study design is very similar to Thelin et al. s., except we were unable compare the use of UBR with a second reading technique. Instead, seven subjects used UBR to inspect the same design document as used in Thelin et al. s study, under the same experimental conditions. We ask the general research question: How does the performance of the subjects--in our study, using UBR, compare with the performance of those subjects using UBR in Thelin et al. s study We find that the subjects in our study perform slightly better than the comparable subjects in Thelin et al. s study. There is some indication of better performing and poorer performing subjects. There is also some indication of easier and more difficult--faults to detect.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Hertfordshire
dc.titleA partial replication of Thelin et al. s Usage Based Reading experimenten
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record