Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKadir, Shabnam
dc.contributor.authorKaza, Chrysoula
dc.contributor.authorWeissbart, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorReichenbach, Tobias
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-24T01:09:12Z
dc.date.available2020-03-24T01:09:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-01
dc.identifier.citationKadir , S , Kaza , C , Weissbart , H & Reichenbach , T 2020 , ' Modulation of speech-in-noise comprehension through transcranial current stimulation with the phase-shifted speech envelope ' , IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems & Rehabilitation Engineering , vol. 28 , no. 1 , 8903231 , pp. 23 - 31 . https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2939671
dc.identifier.issn1558-0210
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 18720517
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3f709e4e-8082-4dba-a664-88c218280448
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85078201944
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-0103-9156/work/71186209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/22456
dc.descriptionThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractNeural activity tracks the envelope of a speech signal at latencies from 50 ms to 300 ms. Modulating this neural tracking through transcranial alternating current stimulation influences speech comprehension. Two important variables that can affect this modulation are the latency and the phase of the stimulation with respect to the sound. While previous studies have found an influence of both variables on speech comprehension, the interaction between both has not yet been measured. We presented 17 subjects with speech in noise coupled with simultaneous transcranial alternating current stimulation. The currents were based on the envelope of the target speech but shifted by different phases, as well as by two temporal delays of 100 ms and 250 ms. We also employed various control stimulations, and assessed the signal-to-noise ratio at which the subject understood half of the speech. We found that, at both latencies, speech comprehension is modulated by the phase of the current stimulation. However, the form of the modulation differed between the two latencies. Phase and latency of neurostimulation have accordingly distinct influences on speech comprehension. The different effects at the latencies of 100 ms and 250 ms hint at distinct neural processes for speech processing.en
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems & Rehabilitation Engineering
dc.subjectTranscranial current stimulation
dc.subjectspeech envelope
dc.subjectspeech-in-noise comprehension
dc.subjectInternal Medicine
dc.subjectNeuroscience(all)
dc.subjectBiomedical Engineering
dc.titleModulation of speech-in-noise comprehension through transcranial current stimulation with the phase-shifted speech envelopeen
dc.contributor.institutionCentre of Data Innovation Research
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Physics, Engineering & Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionBiocomputation Research Group
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078201944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2939671
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record