Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorein-Zamir, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorShahper, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorGasull-Camos, Julia
dc.contributor.authorFineberg, Naomi
dc.contributor.authorRobbins, Trevor
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-18T00:06:29Z
dc.date.available2020-04-18T00:06:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-15
dc.identifier.citationMorein-Zamir , S , Shahper , S , Gasull-Camos , J , Fineberg , N & Robbins , T 2020 , ' Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder ' , PLoS ONE , vol. 15 , no. 1 , e0225970 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225970
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/22605
dc.description.abstractHigh levels of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) could contribute to abnormal decision making in uncertain situations. Patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) often report high IU, indecisiveness and the need to seek greater certainty before making decisions. The Beads task is a commonly used task assessing the degree of information gathering prior to making a decision and so would be predicted to show impairments in OCD patients. Results to date have found mixed support for this, possibility due to methodological issues. Here, a group of OCD patients (n=50) with no comorbidities was compared with age, gender, and verbal-IQ matched controls (n=50) on the most commonly used version of the Beads task. An independent sample of healthy volunteers with high versus low OC symptoms, and high versus low IU were also assessed (n=125). There was no evidence that patients with OCD differed from control volunteers in the degree of information gathering prior to making a decision. Medication status and age did not appear to mediate performance. Similarly, there were no association in healthy volunteers between task performance and OC or IU characteristics. Additional measures examining the degree of certainty initially showed support for greater uncertainty in patients, but this was due to deviations from task instructions in a subset of patients. We conclude that despite the large sample size and good matching between groups, the Beads task in its most widely used form is not a useful measure of IU or of information gathering in OCD. The results argue against a robust behavioural difference in OCD when compared to controls. Recommendations for future studies employing the task are discussed.en
dc.format.extent1034149
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNeuropsychological Tests
dc.subjectObsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology
dc.subjectUncertainty
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
dc.subjectGeneral
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
dc.titleAvoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorderen
dc.contributor.institutionCognitive Neuropsychology
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077941697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1371/journal.pone.0225970
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record