Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWaite, Frances
dc.contributor.authorChilcot, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorMoss‐Morris, Rona
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, Ken
dc.contributor.authorPicariello, Federica
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-04T14:00:01Z
dc.date.available2022-04-04T14:00:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-25
dc.identifier.citationWaite , F , Chilcot , J , Moss‐Morris , R , Farrington , K & Picariello , F 2022 , ' Experiences of a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention for fatigue in patients receiving haemodialysis ' , Journal of Renal Care . https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12418
dc.identifier.issn1755-6678
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 203705
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: jorc12418
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/25464
dc.description© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Renal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Dialysis & Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Background: A feasibility randomised‐controlled trial found that a cognitive‐behavioural therapy intervention for renal fatigue has the potential to reduce fatigue in patients receiving haemodialysis, but uptake was low. Objectives: Nested in the randomised‐controlled trial (RC) qualitative interviews were undertaken to understand the acceptability of renal fatigue, the facilitators of, and barriers to, engagement, and the psychosocial processes of change. Design: The trial included 24 participants at baseline. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with nine participants from the intervention arm (n = 12). Approach Interviews were carried out immediately following treatment (3 months post‐randomisation). Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings: Five main themes were formulated. The overarching theme was a sense of coherence (whether the illness, symptoms and treatment made sense to individuals), which appeared to be central to acceptability and engagement. Two themes captured the key barriers and facilitators to engagement, cognitive and illness/treatment burdens and collaboration with the therapist. Participants described changes related to their activity, thoughts and social identity/interactions, which shaped perceptions of change in fatigue. Lastly, participants discussed the optimal delivery of the intervention. Conclusions: This study revealed the importance of patients' understanding of fatigue and acceptance of the treatment model for the acceptability of and engagement with a cognitive‐behavioural therapy‐based intervention for fatigue. Overall, there was an indication that such an intervention is acceptable to patients and the mechanisms of change align with the proposed biopsychosocial model of fatigue. However, it needs to be delivered in a way that is appealing and practical to patients, acknowledging the illness and treatment burdens.en
dc.format.extent15
dc.format.extent1937999
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Renal Care
dc.subjectORIGINAL RESEARCH
dc.subjectcognitive behavioural therapy
dc.subjectdialysis
dc.subjectfatigue
dc.subjectkidney failure
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.titleExperiences of a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention for fatigue in patients receiving haemodialysisen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Engineering and Technology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jorc.12418
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record