Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHendra, Heidy
dc.contributor.authorSridharan, Sivakumar
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, Ken
dc.contributor.authorDavenport, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-25T11:30:01Z
dc.date.available2022-05-25T11:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-06
dc.identifier.citationHendra , H , Sridharan , S , Farrington , K & Davenport , A 2022 , ' Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients ' , Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (GGM) , vol. 8 . https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214221098889
dc.identifier.issn2333-7214
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC9083032
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 299444
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: 10.1177_23337214221098889
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/25527
dc.description© The Author(s) 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.description.abstractBackground: Both frailty and cachexia increase mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients. The clinical frailty score (CFS) is a seven-point scale and less complex than other cachexia and frailty assessments. We wished to determine the characteristics of frail HD patients using the CFS.  Methods: Single centre cross-sectional study of HD patients completing physical activity questionnaires with bioimpedance measurements of body composition and hand grip strength (HGS).  Results: We studied 172 HD patients. The CFS classified 54 (31.4%) as frail, who were older (70.4±12.2 vs 56.2 ± 16.1 years, p < 0.001), greater modified Charlson co-morbidity (3 (2–3) versus 1.5 (0–3), p < 0.001), and body fat (33 (25.4–40.2) versus 26.2 (15.8–34) %, p < 0.01), but lower total energy expenditure (1720 (1574–1818) versus 1870 (1670–2194) kcal/day, p < 0.01), lean muscle mass index (9.1 (7.7–10.1) versus 9.9 (8.9–10.8) kg/m2), and HGS (15.3 (10.3–21.9) versus 23.6 (16.7–34.4) kg), both p < 0.001. On multivariable logistic analysis, frailty was independently associated with lower active energy expenditure (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence limits (CL) 0.98–0.99, p = 0.001), diabetes (OR 5.09, CL 1.06–16.66) and HGS (OR 0.92, CL 0.86–0.98).  Discussion: Frail HD patients reported less active energy expenditure, associated with reduced muscle mass and strength. Frail patients were more likely to have greater co-morbidity, particularly diabetes. Whether physical activity programmes can improve frailty remains to be determined.en
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent604397
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGerontology and Geriatric Medicine (GGM)
dc.subjectBrief Report
dc.subjectdiseases
dc.subjectnursing
dc.subjectfrailty
dc.subjectdiabetes
dc.subjectobesity
dc.subjectGeriatrics and Gerontology
dc.titleCharacteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patientsen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Hertfordshire
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129860163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/23337214221098889
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record