dc.contributor.author | Unver, Mehmet Bilal | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-04T15:00:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-04T15:00:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Unver , M B 2023 , ' Governing fiduciary relationships or building up a governance model for trust in AI? Review of healthcare as a socio-technical system ' , International Review of Law, Computers & Technology , vol. 37 , no. 2 , pp. 198-226 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2023.2192569 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1360-0869 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0001-7952-2634/work/138281135 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/26472 | |
dc.description | © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY license,http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.description.abstract | Fiduciary law aims to mitigate the inherent risk of ‘trust’, which helps restore interpersonal trust. It remains to be answered how trust should be governed in an AI-driven socio-technical system where technical and social factors are involved including interpersonal relationships and AI-human interactions. Taking interpersonal trust as the backdrop of analysis, this article seeks answers to this question focusing on healthcare. It firstly draws a conceptual framework regarding 'trust' and investigates its interplay with AI as well as examines how it is governed under the fiduciary law. Subsequently, it upholds a socio-technical system perspective, examining how to enable and sustain trust in an AI-driven socio-technical system. A governance model is then developed to elicit ‘intrinsic’, ‘dynamic’ and ‘ethical’ values of trust attributed to various elements under a tri-partite framework. It is recognised that findings of the literature as to trust, its trajectory and implications can be implemented within the proposed framework. Furthermore, it brings novelty by re-conceptualising the elements of 'trust' and associated values, marking distinction to its interpersonal roots and fiduciary relationships. It is considered this governance model, by upholding a holistic viewpoint, provides a generalisable framework that can construct, maintain and restore trust in AI-driven socio-technical systems. | en |
dc.format.extent | 30 | |
dc.format.extent | 2486001 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Review of Law, Computers & Technology | |
dc.subject | Trust | |
dc.subject | Fiduciary law | |
dc.subject | Artificial intelligence | |
dc.subject | fiduciary law | |
dc.subject | artificial intelligence | |
dc.subject | General Arts and Humanities | |
dc.subject | General Social Sciences | |
dc.subject | General Health Professions | |
dc.subject | Law | |
dc.subject | Computer Science Applications | |
dc.title | Governing fiduciary relationships or building up a governance model for trust in AI? : Review of healthcare as a socio-technical system | en |
dc.contributor.institution | Hertfordshire Law School | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151921617&partnerID=8YFLogxK | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1080/13600869.2023.2192569 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |