An Assessment Framework for Creative Production in Computing and Engineering Disciplines

Abstract

With the increasing expansion of creative computing courses among higher education institutions, there is a growing demand for more objective and efficient assessment frameworks that cater to the multidisciplinary skills that students engage in during the production of such work. This research addresses persistent gaps for a systematic approach of assessing creative content in technical courses. Existing theories are reviewed including creative requirements framework and computing production model, which leads to the establishment of a newly proposed assessment framework. A mixture of research methods is employed combining both inductive and deductive approaches, evidence- based analysis, and case study, based on data collected over three academic years at a British university. The proposed assessment framework incorporates three factors of production (function, usability, and management) and two attributes of creativity (core and optional requirements), which is evaluated to determine its suitability for accurately reflecting the work undertaken by students. Creativity is quantified in the assessment based on technical contribution. The proposed framework can be applied in the delivery of courses involving creative production in the computer science and engineering disciplines in which teaching usually focuses on technical content rather than contextual design, creativity, or aesthetics. The findings reveal positive feedback and a number of pertinent outcomes, including promoting creativity, student satisfaction, and efficient assessments. The framework may be adopted by educators for similar courses that are underpinned by technical skills and creativity.