Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBiggs, M.
dc.contributor.editorMalcolm, M.
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-21T12:01:29Z
dc.date.available2011-12-21T12:01:29Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationBiggs , M 2004 , Visualisation and Wittgenstein's "Tractatus" . in M Malcolm (ed.) , Multidisciplinary Approaches to Visual Representations and Interpretations . Elsevier , Amsterdam , pp. 293-303 .
dc.identifier.isbn0-444-51463-5
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/4413
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4411-5737/work/40201823
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/7472
dc.description.abstractWittgenstein developed what has become known as "the picture theory of meaning" in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. This has been widely interpreted as a comparison between the way in which an engineering drawing is derived by means of projection from the object, and the way in which language and/or thought is derived from the world around us. Recent research into the intellectual history of graphical representation has shown that in addition to this kind of drawing, other forms of graphical representation were gaining in importance at the time. This chapter uses graphical statics and dynamic modelling to argue that Wittgenstein's picture theory of meaning is not based on a simple analogy of depiction, but on the contrary seeks a mode of representation by which performance and action can be calculated. This interpretation explains why the picture theory may be relevant to Wittgenstein's interest in ethics and the mystical, a matter on which Russell remained completely baffled.en
dc.format.extent125168
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofMultidisciplinary Approaches to Visual Representations and Interpretations
dc.titleVisualisation and Wittgenstein's "Tractatus"en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Creative Arts
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record