| dc.contributor.author | Hayes, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Murphy, V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Peters, L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Smith, Pamela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Davey, N. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Altmann, E. M. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Cleermans, A. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Schunn, C. D. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Gray, W. D. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-28T09:01:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-05-28T09:01:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hayes , J , Murphy , V , Peters , L , Smith , P & Davey , N 2001 , Plural morphology in compounding is not good evidence to support the dual mechanism model . in E M Altmann , A Cleermans , C D Schunn & W D Gray (eds) , Proceedings of the Fourth International conference on Cognitive Modeling . | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 0-8058-4041-7 | |
| dc.identifier.other | dspace: 2299/841 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/8612 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The compounding phenomena is considered to be good evidence to support the dual mechanism model of morphological processing (Pinker & Prince, 1992). However evidence from initial neural net modeling has shown that a single route associative memory based account might provide an equally, if not more valid explanation of the treatment of plurals in compounds. Further neural net modeling and empirical work is proposed to test this single route account | en |
| dc.format.extent | 19093 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings of the Fourth International conference on Cognitive Modeling | |
| dc.title | Plural morphology in compounding is not good evidence to support the dual mechanism model | en |
| dc.contributor.institution | School of Computer Science | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Science & Technology Research Institute | |
| dc.contributor.institution | School of Engineering and Technology | |
| rioxxterms.type | Other | |
