Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBourne, C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-28T12:02:32Z
dc.date.available2012-05-28T12:02:32Z
dc.date.issued2002-09
dc.identifier.citationBourne , C 2002 , ' When am I? A tense time for tense theorists? ' , Australasian Journal of Philosophy , pp. 359-371 . https://doi.org/10.1080/713659472
dc.identifier.issn0004-8402
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 188587
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 24fa12ad-a96b-45d6-9e79-42d6452a1b51
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/4900
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 24944548479
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4980-8911/work/32558786
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/8627
dc.description.abstractIs there anything more certain than the knowledge we have that we are present? It would be a scandal if our best theory of time could not guarantee such knowledge; yet I shall show that certain theories of time (such as Tooley's growing block model and McCall's branching model) cannot guarantee it. Only Presentism and the tenseless theory survive. The rest must be rejected.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
dc.rightsOpen
dc.subjecttime
dc.subjectpresent
dc.subjectbranching model
dc.subjectgrowing block
dc.subjectpresentism
dc.subjecttense
dc.titleWhen am I? A tense time for tense theorists?en
dc.contributor.institutionPhilosophy
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dcterms.dateAccepted2002-09
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1080/713659472
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeOpen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record