dc.contributor.author | Tofallis, C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-10-15T13:06:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-10-15T13:06:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tofallis , C 1996 , ' Improving discernment in DEA using profiling ' , Omega , vol. 24 , no. 3 , pp. 361-364 . https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00065-8 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0305-0483 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 120840 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: fe1540a0-8880-4dcf-81e3-7fa8031b3091 | |
dc.identifier.other | dspace: 2299/920 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 0030153337 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0001-6150-0218/work/34655916 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/920 | |
dc.description | Original article can be found at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03050483 Copyright Elsevier Ltd. DOI : 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00065-8 | |
dc.description.abstract | The failure of data envelopment analysis to provide adequate discrimination between a small number of alternatives is illustrated using a facility location problem. A straightforward modification which finds a desirability (or relative efficiency) score for each input variable provides greater discrimination and at the same time discerns the strengths and weaknesses of each alternative. ---- | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Omega | |
dc.title | Improving discernment in DEA using profiling | en |
dc.contributor.institution | Department of Marketing and Enterprise | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00065-8 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |