Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTejedor, Chon
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-20T14:29:33Z
dc.date.available2014-10-20T14:29:33Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-01
dc.identifier.citationTejedor , C 2003 , ' Sense and Simplicity : Wittgenstein's Argument for Simple Objects ' , Ratio , vol. 16 , no. 3 , pp. 272-289 . https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00222
dc.identifier.issn0034-0006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/14577
dc.description.abstractThis paper puts forward an alternative interpretation of the argument for simple objects advanced in the 2.0s of the Tractatus. In my view, Wittgenstein derives the simplicity of objects directly from his account of possible states, complex objects and senseful propositions. The key to Wittgenstein's argument is the idea that, if there were no simple objects, possible states would not be necessarily possible. If this were the case, however, there would be no senseful language, in Wittgenstein's view. One of the subsidiary aims of this paper is to question the idea that Wittgenstein posits simples because, without them, language would be infinitely analysable.en
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent75264
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRatio
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleSense and Simplicity : Wittgenstein's Argument for Simple Objectsen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Humanities
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionPhilosophy
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/1467-9329.00222
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record