Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Claire
dc.contributor.authorChadborn , Neil H
dc.contributor.authorDevi, Reena
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Christopher D
dc.contributor.authorSartain , Kate
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Adam L
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-25T14:15:02Z
dc.date.available2022-07-25T14:15:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-04
dc.identifier.citationGoodman , C , Chadborn , N H , Devi , R , Williams , C D , Sartain , K & Gordon , A L 2022 , ' General Practitioners’ Role in Advancing Practice in Care Homes: A Realist Review ' , Family Practice . https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac071
dc.identifier.issn0263-2136
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8938-4893/work/116555511
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/25653
dc.description© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licenses. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.description.abstractBackground Despite recent focus on improving healthcare in care homes, it is unclear what role General Practitioners (GPs) should play. To provide evidence for future practice we set out to explore how GPs have been involved in such improvements. Methods Realist review comprised interviews with GP leaders, theory driven literature searches and stakeholder interviews supplemented by searches on GP led medication reviews and end-of-life care. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Psycinfo, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were searched. Grey literature was identified through internet searches and professional networks. Studies were included based upon relevance. Data were coded to develop and test contexts, mechanisms and outcomes for improvements involving GPs. Results Evidence was synthesised from 30 articles. Programme theories described: (1) “negotiated working with GPs”, where other professionals led improvement and GPs provided expertise; and (2) “GP involvement in national/regional improvement programmes”. The expertise of GPs was vital to many improvement programmes, with their medical expertise or role as co-ordinators of primary care proving pivotal. GPs had limited training in quality improvement and care home improvement work had to be negotiated in the context of wider primary care commitments. Conclusions GPs are central to quality improvement in healthcare in care homes. Their contributions relate to their specialist expertise and recognition as leaders of primary care but are challenged by available time and resources to develop this role.en
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent551296
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFamily Practice
dc.titleGeneral Practitioners’ Role in Advancing Practice in Care Homes: A Realist Reviewen
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionOlder People's Health and Complex Conditions
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/fampra/cmac071
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record