Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaton, Emma
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Shivani
dc.contributor.authorVilar, Enric
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, Ken
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T21:00:00Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T21:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-12
dc.identifier.citationCaton , E , Sharma , S , Vilar , E & Farrington , K 2023 , ' Measures of treatment burden in dialysis: A scoping review ' , Journal of Renal Care , pp. 1-11 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12480
dc.identifier.issn1755-6678
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 1332770
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: jorc12480
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/26779
dc.description© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Renal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Dialysis & Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractBackground Dialysis is a life-sustaining treatment for patients with advanced kidney failure, but it is extremely burdensome. Despite this, there are very few tools available to assess treatment burden within the dialysis population. Objective To conduct a scoping review of generic and disease-specific measures of treatment burden in chronic kidney disease, and assess their suitability for use within the dialysis population. Design We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for kidney disease-specific measures of treatment burden. Studies were initially included if they described the development, validation or use of a treatment burden measure or associated concept (e.g., measures of treatment satisfaction, quality of life, illness intrusiveness, disease burden etc.) in adult patients with chronic kidney disease. We also updated a previous scoping review exploring measures of treatment burden in chronic disease to identify generic treatment burden measures. Results One-hundred and two measures of treatment burden or associated concepts were identified. Four direct measures and two indirect measures of treatment burden were assessed, using adapted established criteria, for suitability for use within the dialysis population. The researchers outlined eight key dimensions of treatment burden: medication, financial, administrative, lifestyle, health care, time/travel, dialysis-specific factors, and health inequality. None of the measures adequately assessed all dimensions of treatment burden. Conclusion Current measures of treatment burden in dialysis are inadequate to capture the spectrum of issues that matter to patients. There is a need for dialysis-specific burdens and health inequality to be assessed when exploring treatment burden to advance patient care.en
dc.format.extent11
dc.format.extent1593568
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Renal Care
dc.subjecthealth inequality
dc.subjectscoping review
dc.subjectdialysis
dc.subjectmeasures
dc.subjecttreatment burden
dc.titleMeasures of treatment burden in dialysis: A scoping reviewen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography
dc.contributor.institutionBehaviour Change in Health and Business
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sport Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth and Clinical Psychology Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jorc.12480
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record