Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSturzaker, John
dc.contributor.authorCatulli, Dr. Maurizio
dc.contributor.authorKubitz, Beate
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T11:45:02Z
dc.date.available2024-01-09T11:45:02Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-09
dc.identifier.citationSturzaker , J , Catulli , D M & Kubitz , B 2024 , ' Sustainability trade-offs in Climate Change Geographies in England ' , Sustainability , vol. 16 , no. 2 , 549 , pp. 1-14 . https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020549
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2326-9446/work/152841617
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3922-2677/work/152842471
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/27385
dc.description©2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractThe evidence that climate change is the result of human actions is becoming increasingly stronger, as is the need to take action to limit the worst effects of climate change on the planet. However, politicians continue to equivocate and fail to address the trade-offs which are needed to deliver effective action. In this paper, we report on the potential of bottom-up approaches to transport planning to address the trade-offs between the need to reduce car-based travel and the social consequences of poor mobility options in rural areas. Using the theories of Sustainable Communities and Communities of Practice, we analyse the implementation of the Robin demand-responsive transport service in the West of England, presenting new data relating to the effectiveness of this service in providing low-carbon transport alternatives to rural residents. We find that the Robin is indeed effective, and that it has worked better in one location, where engagement with potential new users of the service has been prioritised. We conclude that such bottom-up transport options can be transformative, subject to the support of key stakeholders and integration with top-down systems of governance.en
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.extent3903600
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability
dc.subjectCommunity
dc.subjectDRT
dc.subjectRural;
dc.subjectSustainability trap
dc.subjectTransport
dc.subjectrural
dc.subjectsustainability trap
dc.subjecttransport
dc.subjectcommunity
dc.subjectGeneral Environmental Science
dc.subjectComputer Science (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectGeography, Planning and Development
dc.subjectEnergy Engineering and Power Technology
dc.subjectHardware and Architecture
dc.subjectManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law
dc.subjectComputer Networks and Communications
dc.subjectRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
dc.titleSustainability trade-offs in Climate Change Geographies in Englanden
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Climate Change Research (C3R)
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183382518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/su16020549
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record