Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorNayak, Arvind
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Amit
dc.contributor.authorBrodie, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorDecaestecker, Karel
dc.contributor.authorTeoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
dc.contributor.authorVasdev, Nikhil
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T13:31:51Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T13:31:51Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-10
dc.identifier.citationIbrahim , M , Nayak , A , Patel , A , Brodie , A , Decaestecker , K , Teoh , J Y-C & Vasdev , N 2024 , ' Comparative study between the use of double J ureteric stents vs bander ureteric stents during robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intra corporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion ' , Journal of robotic surgery , vol. 18 , no. 5 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01766-w
dc.identifier.issn1863-2483
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/27534
dc.description© 2024 Springer Nature. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01766-w
dc.description.abstractRobotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is fast becoming the standard of care with comparable oncological outcomes to open surgery for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Ileal conduit is by far the most popular means of urinary diversion following a cystectomy. Use of stents is common practice to reduce uretero-enteric anastomosis-related complications. In the current study, practice was changed from the use of Double J (DJ) stents to bander stent intraoperatively. The potential advantages of using bander stent are avoiding second surgery for stent removal and easier change under local anaesthetic in the interventional radiology department. To compare the incidence of blocked, slipped stents and rate of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture after RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit between practices of using DJ stents and bander stents. Retrospective analysis of all the patients undergoing Robotic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal ileal conduit between June 2014 and August 2023 was done. Initially, all intracorporeal anastomosis were covered with DJ stents. The practice was changed to cover the anastomosis with bander stent in November 2020. Number of patients needing re-surgery for blocked, slipped stents and ureteroileal anastomotic stricture were analyzed and compared using Chi-square analysis and Fisher’s exact test (P < 0.05). A total of 168 patients underwent RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit between June 2014 and August 2023 of which 128 patents were diverted with DJ stents and 40 with bander stent. The mean age and the patient demographics between the two groups were comparable. Of the 128 patients who were diverted with DJ stents, 6 (4.7%) had blocked stents, 3 (2.3%) had slipped stents, and 3 (2.3%) developed ureteroileal stricture needing readmission and urgent invasive intervention to exchange the stent or nephrostomy tube, whereas only 1 (2.5%) of the 40 patients with bander stent had blocked stent which was changed under local anaesthetic in the interventional radiology suite with no slipped stents reported and 2 (5%) had ureteroileal stricture who needed nephrostomies. Intraoperative ureteric stenting using bander stent has the potential to reduce the incidence of stent-related complications, such as blockage, slippage, and ureteroileal anastomotic stricture, following RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion. Additionally, managing bander stent-related complications is less invasive with lower rate of readmission postoperatively compared to managing DJ stent-related ones.en
dc.format.extent306737
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of robotic surgery
dc.titleComparative study between the use of double J ureteric stents vs bander ureteric stents during robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intra corporeal ileal conduit urinary diversionen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.contributor.institutionExtracellular Vesicle Research Unit
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2025-01-10
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s11701-023-01766-w
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record