Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHawley, C.
dc.contributor.authorGale, T.M.
dc.contributor.authorSivakumaran, T.
dc.contributor.authorLittlechild, B.
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-25T14:35:15Z
dc.date.available2011-05-25T14:35:15Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationHawley , C , Gale , T M , Sivakumaran , T & Littlechild , B 2010 , ' Risk assessment in mental health : staff attitudes and an estimate of time cost ' , Journal of Mental Health , vol. 19 , no. 1 , pp. 88-98 . https://doi.org/10.3109/09638230802523005
dc.identifier.issn0963-8237
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 136472
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8c724b6d-8291-446f-b4dc-8afeb403a2ce
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/5837
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 77949376805
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/5837
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at : http://informahealthcare.com/ Copyright Informa [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractBackground : Risk assessment is a routine part of mental health services, with professionals being required to complete a risk assessment proforma (RAP) for every patient under their care. Aims : This study was designed to investigate staff attitudes to, and beliefs about, the completion of risk assessment paperwork. Method : We surveyed 300 professionals across one county to examine: (i) the amount of time taken to complete RAPs; (ii) attitudes towards completing such paperwork; and (iii) beliefs about the quality and usefulness of the information recorded. Results : We found considerable variation in the amount of time taken to complete RAPs. The median time was 18 minutes with doctors spending significantly less time than nurses. More favourable attitudes towards RAPs were seen in nurses than in doctors, in spite of the increased time spent completing them. Moreover, nurses also held more positive views about the value and benefit of the information recorded in RAPs. Conclusions : The findings suggest that RAP completion may account for a significant proportion of staff time. Inter-professional differences in belief and attitude were prominent and this should be an important consideration in the evolution of risk assessment procedures.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Mental Health
dc.subjectrisk-assessment
dc.subjectmental health
dc.subjectattitude
dc.subjectbelief
dc.subjectcost-effectiveness
dc.titleRisk assessment in mental health : staff attitudes and an estimate of time costen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.contributor.institutionPatient Experience and Public Involvement
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE)
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Work, Mental Health and Learning Disabilities
dc.contributor.institutionNursing, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.contributor.institutionCommunities, Young People and Family Lives
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.3109/09638230802523005
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record