Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChandna, Shahid
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva Gane, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorWarwicker, Paul
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, Roger
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, Ken
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-26T14:59:51Z
dc.date.available2013-02-26T14:59:51Z
dc.date.issued2011-05
dc.identifier.citationChandna , S , Da Silva Gane , M , Marshall , C , Warwicker , P , Greenwood , R & Farrington , K 2011 , ' Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD : comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy ' , Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation , vol. 26 , no. 5 , pp. 1608 -1614 . https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq630
dc.identifier.issn0931-0509
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1441333
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 23fdbeb6-2a4d-47c7-b9da-f497ea7773ec
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 79955611168
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/10076
dc.description© The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
dc.description.abstractBackground. Elderly patients with end-stage renal disease and severe extra-renal comorbidity have a poor prognosison renal replacement therapy (RRT) and may opt to be managed conservatively (CM). Information on the survival of patients on this mode of therapy is limited. Methods. We studied survival in a large cohort of CM patients in comparison to patients who received RRT. Results. Over an 18-year period, we studied 844 patients, 689 (82%) of whom had been treated by RRT and 155 (18%) were CM. CM patients were older and a greater proportion had high comorbidity. Median survival from entry into stage 5 chronic kidney disease was less in CM than in RRT (21.2 vs 67.1 months: P < 0.001). However, in patients aged >75 years when corrected for age, high comorbidity and diabetes, the survival advantage from RRT was ~4 months, which was not statistically significant. Increasing age, the presence of high comorbidity and the presence of diabetes were independent determinants of poorer survival in RRT patients. In CM patients, however, age >75 years and female gender independently predicted better survival. Conclusions. In patients aged >75 years with high extrarenal comorbidity, the survival advantage conferred by RRT over CM is likely to be small. Age >75 years and female gender predicted better survival in CM patients. The reasons for this are unclear.en
dc.format.extent7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
dc.subjectchronic kidney disease
dc.subjectcomorbidity
dc.subjectconservative management
dc.subjectelderly
dc.subjectSURVIVAL
dc.titleSurvival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD : comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapyen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Postgraduate Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionPostgraduate Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionHealth Services and Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionPharmacology and Clinical Science Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq630
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record