Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMa, Fang Fang
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-27T10:19:49Z
dc.date.available2013-02-27T10:19:49Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationMa , F F 2010 , ' A Challenge for China : Is It Possible to Introduce Unfair Prejudice Remedies? (Part II) ' , International Company and Commercial Law Review , vol. 20 , no. 12 , pp. 1-10 .
dc.identifier.issn0958-5214
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1023120
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 850e6100-7395-47f2-a0bc-72be9764dcae
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/10087
dc.description.abstractThis, the second part of a two-part article, explores how unfair prejudice remedies might be introduced into Chinese company law. Looks in particular at the adoption of the English Law Commission proposals, not included in the Companies Act 2006, regarding the inclusion of exit and arbitration articles in a company's articles of association. Recommends a statutory list in future Chinese company legislation clearly identifying unfairly prejudicial conduct and specific remediesen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Company and Commercial Law Review
dc.titleA Challenge for China : Is It Possible to Introduce Unfair Prejudice Remedies? (Part II)en
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionLaw
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolHertfordshire Law School
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstyperestrictedAccess


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record