Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenderson, L.
dc.contributor.authorDittrich, W.
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-29T12:10:40Z
dc.date.available2007-10-29T12:10:40Z
dc.date.issued1993
dc.identifier.citationHenderson , L & Dittrich , W 1993 , ' Decomposing the corpus of neuropsychological tests ' , Psycoloquy , vol. 4 , no. 32 .
dc.identifier.issn1055-0143
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/1016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/1016
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at: http://psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
dc.description.abstractThis commentary has had two primary concerns: We have attempted to address the difficulties and possibilities of using cognitive tests to measure the underlying biological basis for mental disorders. In particular, we have argued that to understand and interpret test results in psychiatry appropriate models of cognitive brain operations on a process-analytic level rather than on a psychometric level are essential. We have also discussed particular results of Abbruzzese et al.'s study, pointing out alternative interpretations of their perseveration results and some preconditions for demonstrating a true double dissociation. Rather than proceeding from the assumption of a unitary disease entity, we prefer to view "schizophrenia" as heterogeneous in its neuropathological and cognitive processing substrates, reflected in Bleuler's term "the schizophrenias."en
dc.format.extent35812
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPsycoloquy
dc.titleDecomposing the corpus of neuropsychological testsen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record