Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvon Hanxleden, Reinhard
dc.contributor.authorHolsti, Niklas
dc.contributor.authorLisper, Björn
dc.contributor.authorPloedereder, Erhard
dc.contributor.authorWilhelm, Reinhard
dc.contributor.authorBonenfant, Armelle
dc.contributor.authorCassé, Hugues
dc.contributor.authorBünte, Sven
dc.contributor.authorFellger, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorGepperth, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorGustafsson, Jan
dc.contributor.authorHuber, Benedikt
dc.contributor.authorIslam, Nazrul Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorKästner, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorKirner, Raimund
dc.contributor.authorKovacs, Laura
dc.contributor.authorKrause, Felix
dc.contributor.authorde Michiel, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorOlesen, Mads Christian
dc.contributor.authorPrantl, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorPuffitsch, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorRochange, Christine
dc.contributor.authorSchoeberl, Martin
dc.contributor.authorWegener, Simon
dc.contributor.authorZolda, Michael
dc.contributor.authorZwirchmayr, Jakob
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-11T08:29:38Z
dc.date.available2013-04-11T08:29:38Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationvon Hanxleden , R , Holsti , N , Lisper , B , Ploedereder , E , Wilhelm , R , Bonenfant , A , Cassé , H , Bünte , S , Fellger , W , Gepperth , S , Gustafsson , J , Huber , B , Islam , N M , Kästner , D , Kirner , R , Kovacs , L , Krause , F , de Michiel , M , Olesen , M C , Prantl , A , Puffitsch , W , Rochange , C , Schoeberl , M , Wegener , S , Zolda , M & Zwirchmayr , J 2011 , WCET Tool Challenge 2011 : Report . in Procs 11th Int Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis : (WCET'11) . < http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/projects/WCC/2011 >
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1343803
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: faa692a8-3e7a-4e69-86ba-92cebc138162
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:96F6CEFE5EFE41B1DDC88C53A642604B
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/10354
dc.description.abstractFollowing the successful WCET Tool Challenges in 2006 and 2008, the third event in this series was organized in 2011, again with support from the ARTIST DESIGN Network of Excellence. Following the practice established in the previous Challenges, the WCET Tool Challenge 2011 (WCC’11) defined two kinds of problems to be solved by the Challenge participants with their tools, WCET problems, which ask for bounds on the execution time, and flow-analysis problems, which ask for bounds on the number of times certain parts of the code can be executed. The benchmarks to be used in WCC’11 were debie1, PapaBench, and an industrial-strength application from the automotive domain provided by Daimler. Two default execution platforms were suggested to the participants, the ARM7 as “simple target” and the MPC5553/5554 as a “complex target,” but participants were free to use other platforms as well. Ten tools participated in WCC’11: aiT, Astr´ee, Bound-T, FORTAS, METAMOC, OTAWA, SWEET, TimeWeaver, TuBound and WCAen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProcs 11th Int Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis
dc.titleWCET Tool Challenge 2011 : Reporten
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionScience & Technology Research Institute
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.mrtc.mdh.se/projects/WCC/2011
dc.relation.school
dcterms.dateAccepted2011
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record