Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHart, C.J.
dc.date.accessioned2007-11-19T11:33:28Z
dc.date.available2007-11-19T11:33:28Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationHart , C J 2005 , ' Analysing political discourse: Toward a cognitive approach ' , Critical Discourse Studies , vol. 2 , no. 2 , pp. 189-194 . https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283706
dc.identifier.issn1740-5904
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 109986
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 6c25ffe0-16bc-486f-84f2-ea4fe373e20b
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/1071
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/1071
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713695016 Copyright Informa / Taylor and Francis --DOI : 10.1080/17405900500283706
dc.description.abstractThe critical study of political discourse has up until very recently rested solely within the domain of the social sciences. Working within a linguistics framework, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), in particular Fairclough (Fairclough 1989, 1995a, 1995b, 2001; Fairclough and Wodak 1997), has been heavily influenced by Foucault.2 The linguistic theory that CDA and critical linguistics especially (which CDA subsumes) has traditionally drawn upon is Halliday‟s Systemic-Functional Grammar, which is largely concerned with the function of language in the social structure3 (Fowler et al. 1979; Fowler 1991; Kress and Hodge 1979).[opening paragraph]en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Discourse Studies
dc.titleAnalysing political discourse: Toward a cognitive approachen
dc.contributor.institutionEnglish Literature and Creative Writing
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283706
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record