Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirnak, H.
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, M.
dc.contributor.authorKaya, C.
dc.contributor.authorBolat, I.
dc.contributor.authorIkinci, A.
dc.contributor.authorHiggs, D.
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T14:31:50Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T14:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationKirnak , H , Simsek , M , Kaya , C , Bolat , I , Ikinci , A & Higgs , D 2003 , ' Effects of preharvest drip-irrigation scheduling on strawberry yield, quality and growth ' , Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture , vol. 43 , no. 1 , pp. 105-111 . https://doi.org/10.1071/EA02045
dc.identifier.issn0816-1089
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1542170
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f79f8a66-b913-4c8f-9db7-093680cbc66e
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 0037222881
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/10944
dc.description.abstractStrawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch) cultivars, Oso Grande and Camarosa were grown in the field from July 1999 to May 2000 in order to investigate the effectiveness of preharvest drip-irrigation management on fruit yield, quality (i.e. soluble dry matter, fruit size), leaf macro-nutrient composition and normal growth parameters. All plots were irrigated uniformly until 2 weeks before harvest. Differential treatments were then imposed ranging from a complete cut-off of irrigation to full irrigation through the harvest period. Preharvest drip-irrigation management treatments were (i) complete irrigation cut-off, dry (D), (ii) normal irrigation based on class A pan and percentage cover (C), (iii) 75% of normal irrigation, C (IR1), (iv) 50% of normal irrigation, C (IR2), and (v) 25% of normal irrigation, C (IR3). Normal irrigation (control, C) was created by irrigating plants once every 2 days at 100% A pan (Epan) evaporation. No irrigation (D) and IR3 treatments caused reductions in most parameters measured, except water-soluble dry matter concentrations (SDM) in fruit compared with other treatments. There were no significant differences between C, IR1, and IR2 treatments in normal growth parameters or leaf nutrient composition. Fruit size and SDM were both significantly affected by late-season irrigation management; individual fruit weight was significantly reduced and SDM increased even in the IR2 and IR3 treatments compared with control values. Fruit yield was not affected significantly by reduced water application except in the D treatment. These results clearly indicate that reduced preharvest irrigation was partially detrimental; a small reduction in irrigation (IR1) had little or no effect but 50% or less of normal irrigation, while not reducing overall fruit yield, resulted in smaller fruits.en
dc.format.extent7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
dc.titleEffects of preharvest drip-irrigation scheduling on strawberry yield, quality and growthen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Human and Environmental Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037222881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1071/EA02045
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record