Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSu, H.
dc.contributor.authorFitt, Bruce D.L.
dc.contributor.authorWelham, S.J.
dc.contributor.authorSansford, C.E.
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, K.G.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-25T13:02:41Z
dc.date.available2013-07-25T13:02:41Z
dc.date.issued1998-06
dc.identifier.citationSu , H , Fitt , B D L , Welham , S J , Sansford , C E & Sutherland , K G 1998 , ' Effects of light leaf spot ( Pyrenopeziza brassicae ) on yield of winter oilseed rape ( Brassica napus ) ' , Annals of Applied Biology , vol. 132 , no. 3 , pp. 371-386 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1998.tb05215.x
dc.identifier.issn1744-7348
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1405603
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 0fc59fc8-83ff-474c-a110-b822423fe27f
dc.identifier.otherBibtex: urn:e46896fec0b689b54a18a8b0a5f72cda
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 0031853148
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/11184
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between development of light leaf spot and yield loss in winter oilseed rape was analysed, initially using data from three experiments at sites near Aberdeen in Scotland in the seasons 1991/92, 1992/93 and 1993/94, respectively. Over the three seasons, single-point models relating yield to Light leaf spot incidence (% plants with leaves with light leaf spot) at GS 3.3 (flower buds visible) generally accounted for more of the variance than single-point models at earlier or later growth stages. Only in 1992/93, when a severe light leaf spot epidemic developed on leaves early in the season, did the single-point model for disease severity on leaves at GS 3.5/4.0 account for more of the variance than that for disease incidence at GS 3.3. In 1991/92 and 1992/3, when reasonably severe epidemics developed on stems, the single-point model for light leaf spot incidence (stems) at GS 6.3 accounted for as much of the variance. Two-point (disease severity at GS 3.3 and GS 4.0) and AUDPC models (disease incidence/severity) accounted for more of the variance than the single-point model based on disease incidence at GS 3.3 in 1992/93 but not in the other two seasons. Therefore, a simple model using the light leaf spot incidence at GS 3.3 (x) as the explanatory variable was selected as a predictive model to estimate % yield loss (y(r)): y(r) = 0.32x - 0.57. This model fitted all three data sets from Scotland. When data sets from Rothamsted, Rosemaund and Thurloxton in England were used to test it, this single-point predictive model generally fitted the data well, except when yield loss was clearly not related to occurrence of light leaf spot. However, the regression lines relating observed yield loss to light leaf spot incidence at GS 3.3 often had smaller slopes than the line produced by the model based on Scottish data.en
dc.format.extent16
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Applied Biology
dc.subjectlight leaf spot
dc.subjectmodel
dc.subjectoilseed rape
dc.subjectPyrenopeziza brassicae
dc.subjectyield
dc.subjectyield loss
dc.titleEffects of light leaf spot (Pyrenopeziza brassicae) on yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)en
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Human and Environmental Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionGeography, Environment and Agriculture
dc.contributor.institutionCrop Protection and Climate Change
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1998.tb05215.x
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record