Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaines, Simon D.
dc.contributor.authorChilton, Caroline H.
dc.contributor.authorCrowther, Grace S.
dc.contributor.authorTodhunter, Sharie L.
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Jane
dc.contributor.authorWilcox, Mark H.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-30T13:03:05Z
dc.date.available2013-07-30T13:03:05Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBaines , S D , Chilton , C H , Crowther , G S , Todhunter , S L , Freeman , J & Wilcox , M H 2013 , ' Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline against Clostridium difficile and propensity to induce C. difficile infection in an in vitro human gut model ' , Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy , vol. 68 , no. 8 , pp. 1842-49 . https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt107
dc.identifier.issn1460-2091
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/11220
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of exposure to ceftaroline or ceftriaxone on the epidemic Clostridium difficile strain PCR ribotype 027 and the indigenous gut microflora in an in vitro human gut model. Additionally, the MICs of ceftriaxone and ceftaroline for 60 C. difficile isolates were determined. METHODS: Two triple-stage chemostat gut models were primed with human faeces and exposed to ceftaroline (10 mg/L, twice daily, 7 days) or ceftriaxone (150 mg/L, once daily, 7 days). Populations of indigenous gut microorganisms, C. difficile total viable counts, spore counts, cytotoxin titres and antimicrobial concentrations were monitored throughout. MICs were determined by a standard agar incorporation method. RESULTS: In the gut model, both ceftaroline and ceftriaxone induced C. difficile spore germination, proliferation and toxin production, although germination occurred 5 days later in the ceftaroline-exposed model. Toxin detection was sustained until the end of the experimental period in both models. No active antimicrobial was detected in vessel 3 of either model, although inhibitory effects on microflora populations were observed. Ceftaroline was ∼8-fold more active against C. difficile than ceftriaxone (geometric mean MICs, 3.38 versus 28.18 mg/L; MIC90s, 4 versus 64 mg/L; and MIC ranges, 0.125-16 versus 8-128 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline, like ceftriaxone, can induce simulated C. difficile infection in a human gut model. However, low in vivo gut concentrations of ceftaroline and increased activity against C. difficile in comparison with ceftriaxone mean that the true propensity of this novel cephalosporin to induce C. difficile infection remains unclear.en
dc.format.extent342563
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
dc.titleEvaluation of antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline against Clostridium difficile and propensity to induce C. difficile infection in an in vitro human gut modelen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionMicrobiology and Biotechnology
dc.contributor.institutionBiosciences Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Mechanisms of Disease and Drug Discovery
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/jac/dkt107
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record