Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLam, L.T.
dc.contributor.authorSun, Yi
dc.contributor.authorDavey, N.
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Roderick
dc.contributor.authorPrapopoulou, M.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Marc
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Gary
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-02T15:48:07Z
dc.date.available2013-08-02T15:48:07Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationLam , L T , Sun , Y , Davey , N , Adams , R , Prapopoulou , M , Brown , M & Moss , G 2010 , ' The application of feature selection to the development of Gaussian process models for percutaneous absorption. ' , Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology , vol. 62 , no. 6 , pp. 738-749 . https://doi.org/10.1211/jpp.62.06.0010
dc.identifier.issn0022-3573
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/11285
dc.descriptionThe definitive version can be found at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/ Copyright Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim was to employ Gaussian processes to assess mathematically the nature of a skin permeability dataset and to employ these methods, particularly feature selection, to determine the key physicochemical descriptors which exert the most significant influence on percutaneous absorption, and to compare such models with established existing models. Methods: Gaussian processes, including automatic relevance detection (GPRARD) methods, were employed to develop models of percutaneous absorption that identified key physicochemical descriptors of percutaneous absorption. Using MatLab software, the statistical performance of these models was compared with single linear networks (SLN) and quantitative structure–permeability relationships (QSPRs). Feature selection methods were used to examine in more detail the physicochemical parameters used in this study. A range of statistical measures to determine model quality were used. Key findings: The inherently nonlinear nature of the skin data set was confirmed. The Gaussian process regression (GPR) methods yielded predictive models that offered statistically significant improvements over SLN and QSPR models with regard to predictivity (where the rank order was: GPR > SLN > QSPR). Feature selection analysis determined that the best GPR models were those that contained log P, melting point and the number of hydrogen bond donor groups as significant descriptors. Further statistical analysis also found that great synergy existed between certain parameters. It suggested that a number of the descriptors employed were effectively interchangeable, thus questioning the use of models where discrete variables are output, usually in the form of an equation. Conclusions: The use of a nonlinear GPR method produced models with significantly improved predictivity, compared with SLN or QSPR models. Feature selection methods were able to provide important mechanistic information. However, it was also shown that significant synergy existed between certain parameters, and as such it was possible to interchange certain descriptors (i.e. molecular weight and melting point) without incurring a loss of model quality. Such synergy suggested that a model constructed from discrete terms in an equation may not be the most appropriate way of representing mechanistic understandings of skin absorption.en
dc.format.extent375932
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
dc.subjectpercutaneous absorption
dc.subjectgaussian Process
dc.subjectmachine learning methods
dc.subjectquantitative structure-permeability relationships
dc.titleThe application of feature selection to the development of Gaussian process models for percutaneous absorption.en
dc.contributor.institutionScience & Technology Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Pharmacy
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research into Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology
dc.contributor.institutionPharmaceutics
dc.contributor.institutionSkin and Nail Group
dc.contributor.institutionAirway Group
dc.contributor.institutionBioadhesive Drug Delivery Group
dc.contributor.institutionNanopharmaceutics
dc.contributor.institutionPharmaceutical Analysis and Product Characterisation
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1211/jpp.62.06.0010
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record