Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirnak, H.
dc.contributor.authorTas, I.
dc.contributor.authorKaya, C.
dc.contributor.authorHiggs, D.
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-21T09:30:08Z
dc.date.available2013-08-21T09:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2002-12
dc.identifier.citationKirnak , H , Tas , I , Kaya , C & Higgs , D 2002 , ' Effects of deficit irrigation on growth, yield, and fruit quality of eggplant under semi-arid conditions ' , Australian Journal of Agricultural Research , vol. 53 , no. 12 , pp. 1367-1373 . https://doi.org/10.1071/AR02014
dc.identifier.issn0004-9409
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1542232
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 396739a4-14c7-459b-b86e-3d2a4a94c824
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 0036949851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/11418
dc.descriptionCopyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstractEggplant (Solanum melongena L.) cv. Pala was grown in the field from March to August 2001 in order to investigate the effects of deficit irrigation on fruit yield and quality (i.e. soluble dry matter, fruit size), leaf relative water content, leaf area index (LAI), leaf chlorophyll concentration, electrolyte leakage, and leaf nutrient composition (N, P, K) in eggplant. Treatments were: (1) well-watered treatment receiving 100% replenishment of A pan evaporation on a daily basis (C); (2) water-stressed treatment receiving 90% replenishment of A pan evaporation at 4-day intervals (WS); (3) water-stressed treatment receiving 80% replenishment of A pan evaporation at 8-day intervals (WS); and (4) water-stressed treatment receiving 70% replenishment of A pan evaporation at 12-day intervals (WS). A total of 1276 mm of water was applied to C treatment, and the seasonal water use of eggplant ranged from 905 to 1373 mm. The C treatment had the highest yield as well as the largest and the heaviest fruit. WS did not significantly affect fruit yield or fruit size but fruits were slightly lighter; plant height, stem diameter, and shoot and root dry weights, LAI, leaf relative water content, nutrient concentrations, and chlorophyll concentrations in leaves were the same as in C; SDM was higher than C. The WS and WS treatments caused reductions in most parameters, except water-soluble dry matter (SDM) concentrations in fruits, compared with the unstressed (C) treatment. WS and WS treatments enhanced fruit quality (in terms of SDM) and increased electrolyte leakage compared with C. WS and WS reduced marketable yield by 12% and 28.6%, respectively, compared with C. The highest total water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency were in WS, resulting in a 20.4% water saving compared with C. The results revealed that the optimal irrigation strategy for eggplant could depend on balancing the situational requirements in terms of irrigation water, yields, and fruit size and quality.en
dc.format.extent7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research
dc.titleEffects of deficit irrigation on growth, yield, and fruit quality of eggplant under semi-arid conditionsen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Human and Environmental Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036949851&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1071/AR02014
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record