Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChilcott, Robert
dc.contributor.authorDalton, Christopher H.
dc.contributor.authorAshley, Zoe
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Ceri E.
dc.contributor.authorBradley, Simon T.
dc.contributor.authorMaidment, Michael P.
dc.contributor.authorJenner, John
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Roger F. R.
dc.contributor.authorGwyther, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorRice, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-17T07:45:18Z
dc.date.available2013-09-17T07:45:18Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationChilcott , R , Dalton , C H , Ashley , Z , Allen , C E , Bradley , S T , Maidment , M P , Jenner , J , Brown , R F R , Gwyther , R J & Rice , P 2007 , ' Evaluation of barrier creams against sulphur mustard: (II) in vivo and in vitro studies using the domestic white pig ' , Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology , vol. 26 , no. 3 , pp. 235-247 . https://doi.org/10.1080/15569520701212373
dc.identifier.issn1556-9527
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/11576
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies in our laboratory have demonstrated that barrier creams, comprising perfluorinated polymers, are effective against the chemical warfare agent sulphur mustard (SM) when evaluated using human skin in vitro. The purpose of this follow-up study was to further evaluate three candidate ( perfluorinated) barrier creams against SM ( vapour) using the domestic white pig. The severity and progression of the resulting skin lesions were quantified daily for three weeks post-exposure using biophysical measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin reflectance spectroscopy (SRS). Skin biopsies obtained post-mortem were evaluated by light microscopy and additional skin samples were obtained from adjacent ( unexposed) skin sites for a comparative in vitro skin absorption study. Samples of SM vapour within the dosing chambers were measured ex vivo to ascertain the exposure dose (Ct). The three creams were highly effective against SM in vivo (Ct similar to 5000 mg center dot min center dot m(-3)): After 3 weeks, barrier cream pre-treated sites were not significantly different from control ( unexposed) skin when evaluated by TEWL, SRS or histology. In contrast, skin exposed to SM without pre-treatment showed evidence of persistent damage that was consistent with the slow healing time observed in humans. The amount of SM absorbed in vitro in untreated pig skin was similar to that required to cause comparable lesions in human skin (8 - 20 and 4 - 10 mu g center dot cm(-2), respectively), further validating the use of pigs as a toxicologically-relevant dermal model for SM exposure.en
dc.format.extent13
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
dc.subjectchemical warfare agent
dc.subjectreflectance spectroscopy
dc.subjectskin protection
dc.subjectTEWL
dc.subjecttopical skin protectant
dc.subjectTRANSEPIDERMAL WATER-LOSS
dc.subjectPERCUTANEOUS-ABSORPTION
dc.subjectVESICANT BURNS
dc.subjectSKIN
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.titleEvaluation of barrier creams against sulphur mustard: (II) in vivo and in vitro studies using the domestic white pigen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research into Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology
dc.contributor.institutionPharmaceutics
dc.contributor.institutionToxicology
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE)
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/15569520701212373
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record