dc.contributor.author | Rudd, Anthony | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-09-24T17:15:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-09-24T17:15:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rudd , A 2008 , ' Skepticism, sublimity and transcendence ' , International Philosophical Quarterly , vol. 48 , no. 3 , pp. 289-304 . https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq200848344 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0019-0365 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 2319742 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 72507092-d7c2-4583-8706-e3ce73e79150 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 67649553024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/11637 | |
dc.description.abstract | Stanley Cavell has suggested that the deepest roots of skepticism lie in a sense of alienation between the subject and the world, and this has led him to reassess the philosophical importance of the Romantic project of “re-enchanting” the world. One way to pursue this project is by starting from Kant’s reflections on the sublime. I consider Julian Young’s recent discussion of this topic and the Heideggeran pantheism to which it leads him. I conclude that, while there is much insight in Young’s reflections, there are crucial weaknesses in his position that point towards the plausibility of re-configuring it in more theistic and / or Platonic terms | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Philosophical Quarterly | |
dc.title | Skepticism, sublimity and transcendence | en |
dc.contributor.institution | School of Humanities | |
dc.contributor.institution | Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute | |
dc.contributor.institution | Philosophy | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq200848344 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |