Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenediktsson, O.
dc.contributor.authorDalcher, Darren
dc.contributor.authorThorbergsson, H.
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-17T14:00:13Z
dc.date.available2013-12-17T14:00:13Z
dc.date.issued2006-06
dc.identifier.citationBenediktsson , O , Dalcher , D & Thorbergsson , H 2006 , ' Comparison of software development life cycles : a multiproject experiment ' , IET Software , vol. 153 , no. 3 , pp. 87-101 . https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-sen:20050061
dc.identifier.issn1751-8806
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1270841
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a1dc3701-00c2-4a9f-b150-444b03b1e0b3
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000239099300001
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 33745324025
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/12387
dc.description.abstractA variety of life cycle models for software development are generally available. Many of the variations were composed to overcome problems in the classic waterfall model. However, it is generally difficult to compare and contrast the methods and very little literature is available to guide developers and managers in making choices. Moreover, in order to make informed decisions, developers require access to real data that compares the different models and the results associated with the adoption of each model. An experiment in which 15 software teams developed comparable software products, using four different development approaches (V-model, incremental model, evolutionary model, and extreme programming), is described. Extensive measurements were taken to assess the time, quality, size, and development efficiency of each product. The experimental data collected and the conclusions related to the choice of method, its impact on the project and the quality of the results, are presented.en
dc.format.extent15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofIET Software
dc.titleComparison of software development life cycles : a multiproject experimenten
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Management, Leadership and Organisation
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolHertfordshire Business School
dcterms.dateAccepted2006-06
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1049/ip-sen:20050061
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record