Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWoods, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-08T16:30:32Z
dc.date.available2014-01-08T16:30:32Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationWoods , P 2004 , ' Democratic Leadership : Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership ' , International Journal of Leadership in Education , vol. 7 , no. 1 , pp. 3-26 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1360312032000154522
dc.identifier.issn1464-5092
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 646379
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: af673d2e-4578-44b3-8205-7a47499fba6a
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 12344322012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/12484
dc.description.abstractThis article delineates the distinctiveness of democratic leadership in comparison with distributed leadership. The impetus for the exercise arises from the escalating interest in distributed leadership within the field of leadership and organizational studies. More particularly, this article addresses the danger that the idea of democratic leadership may be eclipsed or colonized by discourses on distributed leadership. A view of democracy is developed in which particular attention is given to critical theoretical roots in Marx's notion of alienation and the pervasive power of Weberian instrumental rationality. The article builds on theoretical modelling by the author (Woods 200372. Woods, PA. (2003). Building on Weber to Understand Governance: Exploring the links between identity, democracy and ‘inner distance’. Sociology, 37(1): 143–163. View all references) of a type of governance (organic governance) in which democratic rationalities are an infusing and challenging feature. Two of the rationalities give to democratic agency its distinctiveness – namely, decisional and ethical rationality. The latter is discussed more fully, as it tends to be given least explicit attention in much literature on democracy. Essential to democracy is the recognition – and, today, the reassertion – that advancing truth is worthwhile, social and possible. Ethical rationality, linked in with the other democratic rationalities, requires, inter alia, creative spaces in a dynamic organizational structure that allows for movement between tighter and looser structural frameworks; a recombination of creative human capacities which overcomes the tension between instrumentally‐rational and affective capacities; and open boundaries of participation. Implications for understanding democratic leadership are highlighted in the discussion.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Leadership in Education
dc.titleDemocratic Leadership : Drawing distinctions with distributed leadershipen
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Professional and Work-Related Learning
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Education
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionEducation
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Education
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1080/1360312032000154522
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstyperestrictedAccess


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record