Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Ross
dc.contributor.authorAnkers, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-09T09:30:36Z
dc.date.available2014-01-09T09:30:36Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationBrennan , R & Ankers , P 2004 , ' In search of relevance : Is there an academic-practitioner divide in business-to-business marketing? ' , Marketing Intelligence and Planning , vol. 22 , no. 5 , pp. 511-519 . https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500410551897
dc.identifier.issn0263-4503
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7179-2960/work/62750363
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/12494
dc.description.abstractThis article reports on three related empirical studies of the relevance of academic research to management practice in the field of business-to-business marketing. These studies comprise a survey of 58 academic researchers, a qualitative study of ten marketing practitioners, and a qualitative study of eight academic researchers. Academic researchers in the field of business-to-business marketing believe that their work is of interest, potential value, and relevance to practitioners, and aspire to make a contribution to management practice. Practitioners claim not to be interested in academic research, and are more favourably disposed towards consultants, who they see as more responsive to, and understanding of, business pressures. It seems clear that although academics would like to get closer to practitioners, they are inhibited by institutional factors, such as academic reward systems and the “publish or perish” culture. Mechanisms for improving the degree of cooperation between researchers and practitioners are exploreden
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMarketing Intelligence and Planning
dc.titleIn search of relevance : Is there an academic-practitioner divide in business-to-business marketing?en
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Marketing and Enterprise
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1108/02634500410551897
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record