Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFreiburghaus, C.
dc.contributor.authorRembges, J.F.
dc.contributor.authorRauscher, T.
dc.contributor.authorKolbe, E.
dc.contributor.authorThielemann, Friedrich-Karl
dc.contributor.authorKratz, K.L.
dc.contributor.authorPfeiffer, B.
dc.contributor.authorCowan, J.J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-22T09:00:27Z
dc.date.available2014-01-22T09:00:27Z
dc.date.issued1999-05-01
dc.identifier.citationFreiburghaus , C , Rembges , J F , Rauscher , T , Kolbe , E , Thielemann , F-K , Kratz , K L , Pfeiffer , B & Cowan , J J 1999 , ' The astrophysical r-process : A comparison of calculations following adiabatic expansion with classical calculations based on neutron densities and temperatures ' , The Astrophysical Journal , vol. 516 , no. 1 , pp. 381-398 . < http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/516/1 >
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1634846
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f2ec8a35-9f91-4108-8a16-5bca49aaaca3
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000080660000036
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 0033130061
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/12599
dc.description.abstractThe rapid neutron-capture process (r-process) encounters unstable nuclei far from beta-stability. Therefore its observable features, like the abundances, witness (still uncertain) nuclear structure as well as the conditions in the appropriate astrophysical environment. With the remaining lack of a full understanding of its astrophysical origin, parameterized calculations are still needed. We consider two approaches: (1) the classical approach is based on (constant) neutron number densities n(n) and temperatures T over duration timescales tau; (2) recent investigations, motivated by the neutrino wind scenario from hot neutron stars after a supernova explosion, followed the expansion of matter with initial entropies S and electron fractions Y-e over expansion timescales tau. In the latter case the freezeout of reactions with declining temperatures and densities can be taken into account explicitly. We compare the similarities and differences between the two approaches with respect to resulting abundance features and their relation to solar r-process abundances, applying for the first time different nuclear mass models in entropy-based calculations. Special emphasis is given to the questions of (a) whether the same nuclear properties far from stability lead to similar abundance patterns and possible deficiencies in (1) and (2), and (b) whether some features can also provide clear constraints on the astrophysical conditions in terms of permitted entropies, Y-e values, and expansion timescales in (2). This relates mostly to the A <110 mass range, where a fit to solar r-abundances in high-entropy supernova scenarios seems to be hard to attain. Possible low-entropy alternatives are presented.en
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Astrophysical Journal
dc.subjectsupernovae : general
dc.subjectPROCESS NUCLEOSYNTHESIS
dc.subjectabundances
dc.subjectMETAL-POOR STARS
dc.subjectnucleosynthesis
dc.subjectDIVERSE SUPERNOVA SOURCES
dc.subjectRICH NUCLEI
dc.subjectWAITING POINT APPROXIMATION
dc.subjectnuclear reactions
dc.subjectN = 20
dc.subjectGROUND-STATE PROPERTIES
dc.subjectNUCLEAR-MASS FORMULA
dc.subjectPROTONEUTRON STARS
dc.subjectDRIVEN WINDS
dc.titleThe astrophysical r-process : A comparison of calculations following adiabatic expansion with classical calculations based on neutron densities and temperaturesen
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Astrophysics Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/516/1
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record