| dc.contributor.author | Marques Sampaio, Daniel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-11T12:58:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-02-11T12:58:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Marques Sampaio , D 2010 , ' Double Erasure : Building the Dome, Rebuilding Britain ' , Revista Magistro , vol. 2 , no. 1 , pp. 18-29 . < http://publicacoes.unigranrio.edu.br/index.php/magistro/article/view/1085 > | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE: 1851709 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 23e05432-0887-4bfe-851e-97f802f23f7a | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/12787 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper discusses two projects associated with the Millennium celebrations in London: the regeneration of Greenwich Peninsula, and the building of the Millennium Dome. The paper examines the Labour Government’s appropriation of these interrelated projects, which started as a Conservative Party’s proposal. It is argued that Labour attempted to redefine them into a narrative of national renewal by employing a discourse of inclusiveness, consensus, and togetherness that entailed ignoring, even erasing, the complex history of the site | en |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Revista Magistro | |
| dc.subject | Arts and Humanities(all) | |
| dc.title | Double Erasure : Building the Dome, Rebuilding Britain | en |
| dc.contributor.institution | School of Creative Arts | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Theorising Visual Art and Design | |
| dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
| dc.identifier.url | http://publicacoes.unigranrio.edu.br/index.php/magistro/article/view/1085 | |
| rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
| herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |
