Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGettinby, G.
dc.contributor.authorMcKellar, Quintin
dc.contributor.authorBairden, K.
dc.contributor.authorTheodoridis, Y.
dc.contributor.authorWhitelaw, A.
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-26T16:00:22Z
dc.date.available2014-02-26T16:00:22Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.identifier.citationGettinby , G , McKellar , Q , Bairden , K , Theodoridis , Y & Whitelaw , A 1985 , ' Comparison of two techniques used for the recovery of nematode infective larvae from pasture ' , Research in Veterinary Science , vol. 39 , no. 1 , pp. 99-102 .
dc.identifier.issn0034-5288
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/12923
dc.description.abstractThe recovery of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from herbage collected manually was compared with the recovery from herbage ingested by sheep with oesophageal fistulae, on five occasions during the grazing season. At least three times more larvae were recovered from the oesophageal fistulates than by manual collection. There was no significant variation between the numbers of larvae collected at 09.00, 12.00 and 15.00, nor was there any difference in the distribution of genera recovered by the two methods. The worm burdens of tracer lambs and the larval counts from the fistulated sheep were used to estimate the rate of larval establishment.en
dc.format.extent4
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofResearch in Veterinary Science
dc.titleComparison of two techniques used for the recovery of nematode infective larvae from pastureen
dc.contributor.institutionOffice of the Vice-Chancellor
dc.contributor.institutionVeterinary Science
dc.contributor.institutionGeography, Environment and Agriculture
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record