Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Sousa, Giseli
dc.contributor.authorMaex, Reinoud
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Roderick
dc.contributor.authorDavey, N.
dc.contributor.authorSteuber, Volker
dc.contributor.editorTorben-Nielsen, Ben
dc.contributor.editorRemme, Michiel
dc.contributor.editorCuntz, Hermann
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-12T15:58:55Z
dc.date.available2014-03-12T15:58:55Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationDe Sousa , G , Maex , R , Adams , R , Davey , N & Steuber , V 2014 , Synaptic plasticity and pattern recognition in cerebellar Purkinje cells . in B Torben-Nielsen , M Remme & H Cuntz (eds) , The Computing Dendrite . Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience , vol. 11 , Springer Nature , pp. 433-448 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8094-5_26
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4614-8093-8
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4614-8094-5
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-0186-3580/work/133139232
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/13098
dc.description.abstractMany theories of cerebellar learning assume that long-term depression (LTD) of synapses between parallel fibres (PFs) and Purkinje cells is the basis for pattern recognition in the cerebellum. Here we describe a series of computer simulations that use a morphologically realistic conductance-based model of a cerebellar Purkinje cell to study pattern recognition based on PF LTD. Our simulation results, which are supported by electrophysiological recordings in vitro and in vivo, suggest that Purkinje cells can use a novel neural code that is based on the duration of silent periods in their activity. The simulations of the biologically detailed Purkinje cell model are compared with simulations of a corresponding artificial neural network (ANN) model. We find that the predictions of the two models differ to a large extent. The Purkinje cell model is very sensitive to the amount of LTD induced, whereas the ANN is not. Moreover, the pattern recognition performance of the ANN increases as the patterns become sparser, while the Purkinje cell model is unable to recognise very sparse patterns. These results highlight that it is important to choose a model at a level of biological detail that fits the research question that is being addresseden
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofThe Computing Dendrite
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSpringer Series in Computational Neuroscience
dc.titleSynaptic plasticity and pattern recognition in cerebellar Purkinje cellsen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionScience & Technology Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Computer Science and Informatics Research
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Physics, Engineering & Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionBiocomputation Research Group
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/978-1-4614-8094-5_26
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record