Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDraper, J.
dc.contributor.authorField, S.
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Hilary
dc.contributor.authorHare, M. J.
dc.identifier.citationDraper , J , Field , S , Thomas , H & Hare , M J 1986 , ' Should women carry their antenatal records? ' , British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) , vol. 292 , no. 6520 , pp. 603 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 960147
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 50edf231-f832-4988-97af-5b0ece39e4dd
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 3081189
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 0022575448
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2072-7827/work/32371716
dc.description.abstractA study of women's views on carrying their medical records during their pregnancy was conducted in Cambridge in 1982. Eighty eight women who were given their full records were compared with a control group of 83 women who carried the traditional cooperation card, both groups answering postal questionnaires about the advantages and disadvantages of carrying their respective records. Most women found advantages in carrying the complete record, although it was too large to carry for practical purposes. Both groups experienced difficulty in understanding what was written on their cards.en
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.)
dc.titleShould women carry their antenatal records?en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionNursing, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionPatient Experience and Public Involvement
dc.contributor.institutionMaternal Health
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record