Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFloridi, L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-09T14:00:18Z
dc.date.available2014-04-09T14:00:18Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.identifier.citationFloridi , L 2014 , ' Information closure and the sceptical objection ' , Synthese , vol. 191 , no. 6 , pp. 1037-1050 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0306-0
dc.identifier.issn0039-7857
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 2021550
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: fb705ecc-47ca-47c0-8f8b-f60be39efdc9
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84896736308
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/13319
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I define and then defend the principle of information closure (pic) against a sceptical objection similar to the one discussed by Dretske in relation to the principle of epistemic closure. If I am successful, given that pic is equivalent to the axiom of distribution and that the latter is one of the conditions that discriminate between normal and non-normal modal logics, a main result of such a defence is that one potentially good reason to look for a formalization of the logic of " {Mathematical expression} is informed that {Mathematical expression}" among the non-normal modal logics, which reject the axiom, is also removed. This is not to argue that the logic of " {Mathematical expression} is informed that {Mathematical expression}" should be a normal modal logic, but that it could still be insofar as the objection that it could not be, based on the sceptical objection against pic, has been removed. In other word, I shall argue that the sceptical objection against pic fails, so such an objection provides no ground to abandon the normal modal logic B (also known as KTB) as a formalization of " {Mathematical expression} is informed that {Mathematical expression}", which remains plausible insofar as this specific obstacle is concerned.en
dc.format.extent14
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSynthese
dc.titleInformation closure and the sceptical objectionen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Humanities
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionPhilosophy
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878930955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Humanities
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-04
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0306-0
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record