dc.contributor.author | Lippitt, John | |
dc.contributor.editor | Pattison, George | |
dc.contributor.editor | Jensen, Helle Møller | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-24T14:30:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-24T14:30:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lippitt , J 2012 , A Philosophical Response : The Kierkegaardian self and person-centred therapy . in G Pattison & H M Jensen (eds) , Kierkegaard's Pastoral Dialogues . Wipf and Stock , pp. 103-112 . | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-61097-832-3 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-62189-361-5 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/14080 | |
dc.description.abstract | What kind of a therapist is Kierkegaard? In this brief response to Helle Møller Jensen & George Pattison's rendering of some of Kierkegaard's Upbuilding Discourses as dialogues, I shall approach this question by looking at a major form of contemporary psychotherapy that claims Kierkegaard as an influence. Carl Rogers’ ‘person-centred’ approach is one of the most commonly practiced forms of contemporary psychotherapy. I shall argue that what Kierkegaard offers is something essentially different from Rogers' approach. In fact, I argue, Rogers’ position ultimately rests on assumptions that manifest a version of what Kierkegaard calls the ‘despair of defiance’. I consider the view of the self and its autonomy presupposed by Rogers’ approach, and compare this view with that of Anti-Climacus, the pseudonym under which Kierkegaard wrote The Sickness Unto Death. While finding something admirable about person-centred therapy’s trust in its clients, I thus raise some Kierkegaard-inspired questions about this trust. And I close by briefly considering how, both in the dialogues presented here and in the therapeutic relationship, a kind of ‘indirect communication’ may be at work. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Wipf and Stock | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Kierkegaard's Pastoral Dialogues | |
dc.title | A Philosophical Response : The Kierkegaardian self and person-centred therapy | en |
dc.contributor.institution | School of Humanities | |
dc.contributor.institution | Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute | |
dc.contributor.institution | Philosophy | |
dc.description.status | Non peer reviewed | |
rioxxterms.type | Other | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |