Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHollands, Rid
dc.contributor.authorPalframan, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-10T14:59:25Z
dc.date.available2014-11-10T14:59:25Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.citationHollands , R & Palframan , L 2014 , ' EIA and EMS integration : Not wasting the opportunity ' , Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 32 , no. 1 , pp. 43-54 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.875670
dc.identifier.issn1461-5517
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 7732610
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 4a5fbd17-5631-4a5f-b07f-18dd15499e8e
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84894238207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/14713
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental tools such as environmental impact assessment (EIA) and environmental management systems (EMS) can be applied to ensure that major projects are constructed and operated using an approach that enables effective environmental protection. Previous research has shown that these tools are frequently applied in isolation at different stages of the project life cycle. The extent of EIA/EMS integration amongst nine of the biggest UK waste management companies was investigated through semi-structured interviews with environmental staff and thematic analysis of their responses. The research found that partial integration of EIA and EMS is widespread. Companies recognised a range of potential benefits to more closely integrating their processes such as system efficiencies, data availability and recognition from the regulator. However, significant barriers to further integration were identified in the form of cost, company structure and the size of the organisation. In a context where the regulation of the waste industry is increasingly aligned towards a risk-based approach, there is a new opportunity to use EIA outputs in an enhanced EMS. More generally, companies should seek to maintain continuity of personnel across the project life cycle and structure their environmental functions so that EIA and EMS staff can work more closely. This would help ensure that the greatest benefit is derived from both tools.en
dc.format.extent12
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofImpact Assessment and Project Appraisal,
dc.subjectEIA
dc.subjectEIA follow-up
dc.subjectEMS
dc.subjectintegration
dc.subjectUK
dc.subjectwaste
dc.subjectGeography, Planning and Development
dc.subjectManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law
dc.titleEIA and EMS integration : Not wasting the opportunityen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Human and Environmental Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionAgriculture, Food and Veterinary Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionGeography, Environment and Agriculture
dc.contributor.institutionEcology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.875670
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record