Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGilhooly, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiou, George
dc.contributor.authorSirota, Miroslav
dc.contributor.authorPaphiti-Galeano, Antonia
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-03T10:03:31Z
dc.date.available2015-03-03T10:03:31Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-02
dc.identifier.citationGilhooly , K , Georgiou , G , Sirota , M & Paphiti-Galeano , A 2015 , ' Incubation and suppression processes in creative problem solving ' , Thinking and Reasoning , vol. 21 , no. 1 , pp. 130-146 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.953581
dc.identifier.issn1354-6783
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 8177390
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 4b23ca06-bdc0-4beb-953f-4afe234a060a
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84911391993
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/15514
dc.descriptionThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in thinking & Reasoning on 12 September 2014, available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.953581.
dc.description.abstractThe present study investigated the role of thought suppression in incubation, using a delayed incubation paradigm. A total of 301 participants were tested over five conditions, viz., continuous work control, incubation with a mental rotations interpolated task, focussed suppression, unfocussed suppression and a conscious expression condition. Checks were made for intermittent work during the incubation condition. The target task was alternative uses for a brick. In the incubation and suppression conditions, participants worked for 4 minutes, then had a break during which suppression or the mental rotations interpolated task was carried out for 3 minutes before conscious work was resumed for a further 4 minutes on the alternative uses task. Results indicated that both incubation with an interpolated distractor task and incubation with suppression were effective in enhancing performance relative to controls. The intermittent work hypothesis (that effects of an incubation period are simply due to illicit conscious work on the target task during the incubation period) was not upheld. The effects of incubation/suppression persisted over the post-incubation working period and the results suggested that unfocussed suppression effects on subsequent fluency lasted longer than focussed suppression effects.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThinking and Reasoning
dc.subjectIncubation
dc.subjectSuppression
dc.subjectCreative Problem Solving
dc.titleIncubation and suppression processes in creative problem solvingen
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionLearning, Memory and Thinking
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.953581
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record