Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoote, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorBaird, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Anthea
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-09T12:48:34Z
dc.date.available2015-03-09T12:48:34Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-01
dc.identifier.citationBoote , J , Baird , W & Sutton , A 2011 , ' Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care : A narrative review of case examples ' , Health Policy , vol. 102 , no. 2-3 , pp. 105-116 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.002
dc.identifier.issn0168-8510
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 8115145
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: abcfe614-d01c-45ef-9636-175ebb1f2bdb
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 80052814022
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 21641075
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/15565
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To review the evidence on public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care; to examine the different methods, levels and stages of involving the public; to synthesise the contributions of the public, as well as the identified tensions, facilitating strategies and recommendations for good practice. Method: Systematic literature search and narrative review. Findings: Seven case examples were found covering the following review topics: patients' perspectives on electro-convulsive therapy; user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research; treatments for degenerative ataxias; teaching, learning and assessment of law in social work education; HIV health promotion for men who have sex with men; the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of public involvement in health research; methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. The public was found to contribute to systematic reviews by: refining the scope of the review; suggesting and locating relevant literature; appraising the literature; interpreting the review findings; writing up the review. Numerous tensions, facilitating strategies and recommendations were identified. Conclusions: The issues raised in this paper should assist researchers in developing and conducting systematic reviews with the involvement of the public.en
dc.format.extent12
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Policy
dc.subjectConduct
dc.subjectDesign
dc.subjectNarrative literature review
dc.subjectPublic involvement
dc.subjectSystematic reviews
dc.subjectHealth Policy
dc.titlePublic involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care : A narrative review of case examplesen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.002
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record