dc.contributor.author | Holderness, G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-24T15:03:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-24T15:03:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-06-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Holderness , G 2014 , ' 'An Arabian in my room' : Shakespeare and the Canon ' , Critical Survey , vol. 26 , no. 2 , pp. 73-89 . https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2014.260204 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0011-1570 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/15829 | |
dc.description.abstract | The literary canon commonly thought of as ancient, accepted and agreed, and consistent between high and popular cultures. This article demonstrates the falsity of these assumptions, and argues that the canon is always provisional, contingent, iterable and overdetermined by multiple consequences of cultural struggle. Using definitions of canonicity from Harold Bloom, Frank Kermode and Pierre Bourdieu, the article shows how the canon is produced, consumed and reproduced. Picking up on Harold Bloom’s use of a poem by Wallace Stevens, the article explores the impact of Arabic adaptations of Shakespeare on canon-formation and canonicity. | en |
dc.format.extent | 7 | |
dc.format.extent | 75697 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Critical Survey | |
dc.subject | Shakespeare canon Arab | |
dc.title | 'An Arabian in my room' : Shakespeare and the Canon | en |
dc.contributor.institution | School of Humanities | |
dc.contributor.institution | Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute | |
dc.contributor.institution | English Literature and Creative Writing | |
dc.contributor.institution | English Literature | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.3167/cs.2014.260204 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |